Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37688691›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2024

Increasing Lung Cancer Screening for High-Risk Smokers in a Frontier Population.

Mark Dignan, Kristin Cina, Michele Sargent, Margaret O'Connor, Romaine Tobacco, Linda Burhansstipanov, Sheikh Ahamed, David White, Daniel Petereit

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Knowledge translation strategies to enhance lung cancer screening programme implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Lung Cancer Screening Participation Among Indigenous Peoples Worldwide: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Opportunities.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mark DignanUniversity of Kentucky, 760 Press Avenue, Room 335, Lexington, KY, 40536-0679, USA. Mark.dignan@uky.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2657-6775
Kristin CinaAvera Research Institute, Rapid City, SD, 57701, USA.
Michele SargentAvera Research Institute, Rapid City, SD, 57701, USA.
Margaret O'ConnorAvera Research Institute, Rapid City, SD, 57701, USA.
Romaine TobaccoAvera Research Institute, Rapid City, SD, 57701, USA.
Linda BurhansstipanovNative American Cancer Research Corporation, Pine, CO, 80470, USA.
Sheikh AhamedUbicomp Lab, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
David WhiteDakota Radiology, Rapid City, SD, 57701, USA.
Daniel PetereitAvera Research Institute, Rapid City, SD, 57701, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Northern Plains American Indians (AIs) have some of the highest smoking and lung cancer mortality rates in the USA. They are a high-risk population in which many are eligible for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, but such screening is rarely used. This study investigated methods to increase LDCT utilization through both a provider and community intervention to lower lung cancer mortality rates. This study used the Precaution Adoption Model for provider and community interventions implemented in four study regions in western South Dakota. The goal was to increase LDCT screening for eligible participants. Intake surveys and LDCT screenings were compared at baseline and 6 months following the education programs for both interventions. A total of 131 providers participated in the provider intervention. At the 6-month follow-up survey, 31 (63%) referred at least one patient for LDCT (p < 0.05). Forty (32.3%) community participants reported their provider recommended an LDCT and of those, 30(75%) reported getting an LDCT (p < 0.05). A total of 2829 patient surveys were completed at the imaging sites and most (88%, n = 962) cited provider recommendation as their reason for obtaining an LDCT. Almost half (46%; n = 131) of the referring providers attended a provider education workshop, and 73% of the providers worked at a clinic that hosted at least one community education session. Over the study period, LDCT utilization increased from 640 to 1706, a 90.9% increase. The provider intervention had the strongest impact on LDCT utilization. This study demonstrated increased LDCT utilization through the provider intervention but increases also were documented for the other intervention combinations. The community-based education program increased both community and provider awareness on the value of LDCTs to lower lung cancer mortality rates.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSmokersEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningSmokingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAmerican IndianCommunity educationLow-dose computed tomographyLung cancerProvider educationScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.