Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37688674›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

Glucose measurements with accu check inform II versus hexokinase plasma method during surgery under general anesthesia, an observational cohort study.

Thomas Kaufmann, Robbert J Slingerland, Mireille A Edens, Cornelis G Olthof

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas KaufmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Robbert J SlingerlandDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Mireille A EdensDepartment of Innovation and Science, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Cornelis G OlthofDepartment of Anesthesiology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands. c.g.olthof@isala.nl.
Isala · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLimited research exists on translation of in-vitro glucose measurement interfering compounds to the in-vivo situation. We investigated whether Point-of-Care glucose measurements by Accu Chek Inform II (ACI II) were accurate to monitor glucose concentrations during surgery with general anesthesia by comparing with the reference laboratory hexokinase plasma glucose test.

methodPatients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were included. Anesthesia was maintained with either Sevoflurane or Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Prior to and after induction, blood glucose was measured with ACI II and the hexokinase test. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess method agreement. Subgroup analyses on glucose measurement differences per type of maintenance anesthesia were performed.

resultsThirty-nine patients were included, and 78 measurements were performed. All paired measurements had clinically acceptable agreement with a percentage error of 10.0% (95% CI 8.0 to 11.9). The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between ACI II and hexokinase for all measurements was 0.0 mmol/L (-0.7 to 0.7 mmol/L). Before induction (n = 39), mean difference was -0.1 mmol/L (-0.6 to 0.4 mmol/L), and after induction (n = 39), mean difference was 0.1 mmol/L (-0.8 to 0.9 mmol/L). Further investigation showed the difference varied per test for patients receiving Sevoflurane compared to patients receiving TIVA (-0.2 ± 0.4 mmol/L vs. 0.4 ± 0.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001). Before and after induction, the difference between ACI II and hexokinase measurements increased for patients receiving Sevoflurane compared to patients receiving TIVA (0.4 ± 0.4 mmol/L vs. -0.4 ± 0.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001).

conclusionThe agreement between glucose measurements using ACI II and the reference laboratory hexokinase test was clinically acceptable with a percentage error of 10.0% (95% CI 8.0 to 11.9). The use of TIVA may negatively affect the measurement performance of the ACI II.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, InhalationPropofolAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, IntravenousAnesthetics, IntravenousBlood GlucoseCohort StudiesHexokinaseHumansSevofluraneAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousBlood GlucoseHexokinasePropofolSevofluraneAccu Chek inform IIAnestheticsGlucose interferencesPOCPropofolSevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID37688674
OpenAlexW4386574256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.