Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37688665›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Prognostic impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative T1a/bN0M0 breast cancer.

Shinsuke Sasada, Naoto Kondo, Hiroya Hashimoto, Yuko Takahashi, Kaori Terata, Kumiko Kida, Yasuaki Sagara, Takayuki Ueno, Keisei Anan, Akihiko Suto and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.

Shinsuke SasadaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1623-869X
Naoto KondoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroya HashimotoCore Laboratory, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Yuko TakahashiDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kitaku, 700-8558, Okayama, Japan.
Kaori TerataDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Japan.
Kumiko KidaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuaki SagaraDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgical Oncology, Social medical corporation Hakuaikai, Sagara Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Takayuki UenoBreast Oncology Center, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Keisei AnanDepartment of Surgery, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Akihiko SutoDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Chizuko KanbayashiDepartment of Breast Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Mina TakahashiDepartment of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.
Rikiya NakamuraDepartment of Breast Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Toshiyuki IshibaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Michiko TsuneizumiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Seiichiro NishimuraDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yoichi NaitoDepartment of General Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Fumikata HaraBreast Oncology Center, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadahiko ShienDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kitaku, 700-8558, Okayama, Japan. tshien@md.okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3202-5512
Hiroji IwataDepartment of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya City University · JPOkayama University Hospital · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPAkita University Hospital · JPChiba Cancer Center · JPHiroshima University · JPKitakyushu Municipal Medical Center · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Sagamihara Hospital · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPShizuoka General Hospital · JPSt. Luke's International Hospital · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JPTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMammography screening has increased the detection of subcentimeter breast cancers. The prognosis for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative T1a/bN0M0 breast cancers is excellent; however, the necessity of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) is uncertain.

methodsWe evaluated the effectiveness of adjuvant ET in patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative T1a/bN0M0 breast cancer who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2012. Standard ET was administrated after surgery. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of distant metastasis. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

resultsAdjuvant ET was administered to 3991 (83%) of the 4758 eligible patients (1202 T1a [25.3%] and 3556 T1b [74.7%], diseases). The median follow-up period was 9.2 years. The 9-year cumulative incidence of distant metastasis was 1.5% with ET and 2.6% without ET (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.93). In multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for distant metastasis were no history of ET, mastectomy, high-grade, and lymphatic invasion. The 9-year overall survival was 97.0% and 94.4% with and without ET, respectively (adjusted HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.83). In addition, adjuvant ET reduced the incidence of ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer (9-year rates; 1.1% vs. 6.9%; sHR, 0.17, and 1.9% vs. 5.2%; sHR, 0.33).

conclusionsThe prognosis was favorable in patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative T1a/bN0M0 breast cancer. Furthermore, adjuvant ET reduced the incidence of distant metastasis with minimal absolute risk difference. These findings support considering the omission of adjuvant ET, especially for patients with low-grade and no lymphatic invasion disease.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenBreast cancerEndocrine therapyEstrogen receptorPrognosisT1a/b

Identifiers

PMID37688665
PMCPMC10564809
OpenAlexW4386572643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.