Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37688643›Full record

SynthesisCancer causes & control : CCC2024

Racial disparities in colorectal cancer clinicopathological and molecular tumor characteristics: a systematic review.

Thomas Lawler, Lisa Parlato, Shaneda Warren Andersen

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. SOMATIC MUTATION PROFILES IN COLORECTAL CANCERS DIFFER BY POPULATION.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gastro hep advances · 2026
    Review
  9. Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frequency ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas Lawler *Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Lisa Parlato *School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Shaneda Warren AndersenCarbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. snandersen@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Understanding the Contribution of Colorectal Cancer Tumor Characteristics to Disparities in Colorectal Cancer SurvivalR01CA255318 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Shaneda Warren Andersen · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
Vitamin D and colorectal cancer risk: an integrated molecular and genetic epidemiologic studyR00CA207848 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WARREN ANDERSEN, SHANEDA · 2018 to 2020
$601k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA207848NCI NIH HHS R01 CA255318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAfrican Americans have the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality of all racial groups in the USA, which may relate to differences in healthcare access or advanced stage at diagnosis. Recent evidence indicates that differences in tumor characteristics may also underlie disparities in mortality. To highlight recent findings and areas for investigation, we completed the first systematic review of racial disparities in CRC tumor prognostic markers, including clinicopathological markers, microsatellite instability (MSI), oncogene mutations, and novel markers, including cancer stem cells and immune markers.

methodsRelevant studies were identified via PubMed, limited to original research published within the last 10 years. Ninety-six articles were identified that compared the prevalence of mortality-related CRC tumor characteristics in African Americans (or other African ancestry populations) to White cases.

resultsTumors from African ancestry cases are approximately 10% more likely to contain mutations in KRAS, which confer elevated mortality and resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition. Conversely, African Americans have approximately 50% lower odds for BRAF-mutant tumors, which occur less frequently but have similar effects on mortality and therapeutic resistance. There is less consistent evidence supporting disparities in mutations for other oncogenes, including PIK3CA, TP53, APC, NRAS, HER2, and PTEN, although higher rates of PIK3CA mutations and lower prevalence of MSI status for African ancestry cases are supported by recent evidence. Although emerging evidence suggests that immune markers reflecting anti-tumor immunity in the tumor microenvironment may be lower for African American cases, there is insufficient evidence to evaluate disparities in other novel markers, cancer stem cells, microRNAs, and the consensus molecular subtypes.

conclusionHigher rates of KRAS-mutant tumors in in African Americans may contribute to disparities in CRC mortality. Additional work is required to understand whether emerging markers, including immune cells, underlie the elevated CRC mortality observed for African Americans.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBiomarkersHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Racial GroupsTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkersProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)African AmericanDisparitiesGastrointestinal cancersMortalityTumor biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37688643
PMCPMC11090693
OpenAlexW4386572423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.