Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37688401›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2023

Improving care safety by characterizing task interruptions during interactions between healthcare professionals: an observational study.

Delphine Teigné, Lucie Cazet, Gabriel Birgand, Leila Moret, Jean-Claude Maupetit, Guillaume Mabileau, Noémie Terrien

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Delphine TeignéStructure Régionale d'Appui (SRA) QualiREL Santé, Hôpital Saint Jacques, 85 rue Saint-Jacques, Nantes Cedex 1 44093, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8179-4188
Lucie CazetStructure Régionale d'Appui (SRA) QualiREL Santé, Hôpital Saint Jacques, 85 rue Saint-Jacques, Nantes Cedex 1 44093, France.
Gabriel BirgandPublic Health Department, University Hospital of Nantes, 85 rue Saint-Jacques, Nantes Cedex 1 44093, France.
Leila MoretPublic Health Department, University Hospital of Nantes, 85 rue Saint-Jacques, Nantes Cedex 1 44093, France.
Jean-Claude MaupetitPublic Health Department, University Hospital of Nantes, 85 rue Saint-Jacques, Nantes Cedex 1 44093, France.
Guillaume MabileauStructure Régionale d'Appui (SRA) QualiREL Santé, Hôpital Saint Jacques, 85 rue Saint-Jacques, Nantes Cedex 1 44093, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1691-7625
Noémie TerrienStructure Régionale d'Appui (SRA) QualiREL Santé, Hôpital Saint Jacques, 85 rue Saint-Jacques, Nantes Cedex 1 44093, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8383-6804

Funding

Direction Générale de l'offre de Soins PREPS DGOS RC17 0400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have investigated interruptions to the work of professionals practicing in inpatient hospitals, and even fewer take account of the functions that make up the system. Safety of care can be improved by considering avoidable interruptions during interactions between managerial and care delivery functions. The present study describes the characteristics of interruptions to the work of professionals working in the inpatient hospital sector, with respect to their typology, frequency, duration, and avoidability in the context of interactions between functions. This direct observational study of interruptions in hospital care was performed in the Pays de la Loire (west coast) area of France. A total of 23 teams (17 institutions) working in medical or surgical specialties (excluding intensive care) were included. Observations were performed between May and September 2019, and lasted seven consecutive hours per team. A pair of observers simultaneously observed the same professional for ∼30 min. Each occupational category was examined. Reported characteristics were: (i) the method and duration of the request, (ii) the location of interrupted and interrupting persons, (iii) the reaction of the interrupted person, (iv) the characteristics of the interrupting person, and (v) the classification of interrupted and interrupting tasks according to their function. An avoidable interruption was defined. Interruptions during interactions between professionals were categorised in terms of their function and avoidability. Descriptive statistical analyses (mean, standard deviation, and distribution) were run. In particular, cross-comparisons were run to highlight avoidability interruptions and interactions between managerial and care delivery functions during the working day, for different professional categories, and for the location of the request. Overall, 286 interrupted professionals were observed and 1929 interruptions were characterised. The majority of interruptions were due to a face-to-face request (58.7%), lasting ≤30 s (72.5%). Professionals engaged in the response in 49.3% of cases. A total of 57.4% of interruptions were avoidable. The average number of interruptions was 10.5 (SD = 3.2) per hour per professional. An analysis of avoidability and interactions between managerial and care delivery functions found that the period between 12:00 and 13:00 was the riskiest in terms of care safety. This study highlighted the characteristics of interruptions to the activity of professionals working in inpatient hospitals. Care teams could focus on making medical and nursing professionals much more aware of the importance of interruptions, and each team could decide how to best-manage interruptions, in the context of their specific working environment.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelQuality ImprovementAwarenessCritical CareFranceHumanscare safetyinteractionobservational studytask interruptionteamworkwork functions

Identifiers

PMID37688401
PMCPMC10507660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.