Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37688400›Full record

SynthesisSports health

Performance-Enhancing Drugs in Healthy Athletes: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.

Alec A Warrier, Eric N Azua, Luke B Kasson, Sachin Allahabadi, Zeeshan A Khan, Enzo S Mameri, Hasani W Swindell, John M Tokish, Jorge Chahla

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alec A WarrierDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Eric N AzuaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Luke B KassonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Sachin AllahabadiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-3039
Zeeshan A KhanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Enzo S MameriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Hasani W SwindellDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
John M TokishMayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.
Jorge ChahlaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Rush University Medical Center · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USMayo Clinic Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMany clinicians, trainers, and athletes do not have a true understanding of the effects of commonly used performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) on performance and health.

objectiveTo provide an evidence-based review of 7 commonly used pharmacological interventions for performance enhancement in athletes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched on April 8, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) assessing the performance-enhancing effects of the following interventions were included: androgenic anabolic steroids (AAS), growth hormone (GH), selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs), creatine, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors, recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO), and cannabis. STUDY

designUmbrella review of SRs and MAs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: Primary outcomes collected were (1) body mass, (2) muscle strength, (3) performance, and (4) recovery. Adverse effects were also noted.

resultsA total of 27 papers evaluating 5 pharmacological interventions met inclusion criteria. No studies evaluating SARMs or ACE-inhibitors were included. AAS lead to a 5% to 52% increase in strength and a 0.62 standard mean difference in lean body mass with subsequent lipid derangements. GH alters body composition, without providing a strength or performance benefit, but potential risks include soft tissue edema, fatigue, arthralgias, and carpel tunnel syndrome. Creatine use during resistance training can safely increase total and lean body mass, strength, and performance in high-intensity, short-duration, repetitive tasks. Limited evidence supports rHuEPO benefit on performance despite increases in both VO

conclusionIn young healthy persons and athletes, creatine can safely provide a performance-enhancing benefit when taken in controlled doses. AAS, GH, and rHuEPO are associated with severe adverse events and do not support a performance benefit, despite showing the ability to change bodily composition, strength, and/or physiologic measures. Cannabis may have an ergolytic, instead of ergogenic, effect.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceDoping in SportsMuscle StrengthPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBody CompositionCannabinoidsCreatineErythropoietinHuman Growth HormoneHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicRecombinant ProteinsSystematic Reviews as TopicTestosterone CongenersAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCannabinoidsCreatineErythropoietinHuman Growth HormonePerformance-Enhancing SubstancesRecombinant ProteinsTestosterone Congenersathletesdopingperformance-enhancing drugssport supplements

Identifiers

PMID37688400
PMCPMC11346223
OpenAlexW4386564711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.