ArticleCancer medicine2023
The metastasis patterns and their prognostic features in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer of different ages.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiogenomic Landscape of Metastatic Endocrine-Positive Breast Cancer Resistant to Aromatase Inhibitors.Cancers · 2025Review
- Prevalence and clinicopathological characteristics of de novo metastatic cancer at a major radiotherapy centre in West Africa: a cross-sectional study.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
- The metastasis patterns and their prognostic features in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer of different ages.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe prognostic outcomes of metastasis patterns in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) of different ages are unknown. Our study used a large-scale data to investigate the metastasis patterns and prognostic features in dnMBC of different ages.
methodsTotal 24,698 women with dnMBC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2010-2018) were divided into three groups by age. Chi-squared test was used to compare metastasis patterns and logistic regression was performed to investigate the risk of age and specific organ metastases. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the overall survival.
resultsIn three groups, young group had the largest proportion of liver metastases (35.2% vs. 28.2% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001), and elderly group had the largest proportion of lung metastases (22.6% vs. 30.0% vs. 35.0%, p < 0.001) and the lowest proportion of bone metastases (65.7% vs. 67.6% vs. 64.4%, p < 0.001). In young group, patients with liver metastases had better prognosis than patients with lung metastases (MST: 34 months vs. 29 months, p = 0.041), but in middle-aged and elderly groups, the prognosis of lung metastases was better than that of liver metastases (MST in middle-aged group: 24 months vs. 20 months, p = 0.002; MST in elderly group: 12 months vs. 6 months, p < 0.001).
conclusionDnMBC patients at different age have distinct metastasis patterns and prognostic features. The findings lend support to consideration of tailored management and surveillance strategies for different age patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.