Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37688365›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2023

How do Australian mental health services use easy read to make information accessible for people with intellectual disability?

Bronwyn Newman, Karen R Fisher, Julian Trollor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Easy Read Health Information for People With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Distributed Health Literacy Among People With Intellectual Disability, Their Supporters and Healthcare Professionals: A Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bronwyn NewmanCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research (CHSSR) Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Karen R FisherSocial Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-6395
Julian TrollorDepartment of Disability and Neuropsychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1056128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccess to health information is a right for all people. Easy read information is one strategy used to make information accessible for people with intellectual disability. This research explored how easy read is used and the ways accessible information can address access barriers, with a focus on Australian mental health services.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted across four sites to explore how easy read was used. Participants (n = 49) were easy read users, health practitioners and staff from services providing mental health care in New South Wales, Australia. An integrated health literacy framework was used to analyse data.

resultsMost mental health staff did not use easy read or other accessible information, and did not consistently offer people with intellectual disability opportunities to understand, appraise and apply health information. This investigation confirmed the limited availability of accessible information resources, including easy read, and the importance of relationships of support when accessing health information.

conclusionPeople with intellectual disability did not routinely have access to mental health information. Substantial change is required to address this disparity. IMPLICATIONS: Agency policy and processes require change to support staff practices that uphold the right to information. Inclusive practices that incorporate using easy read in health contexts, including mental health, are needed to facilitate change.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityMental Health ServicesAustraliaHumansMental HealthReadingaccessible informationeasy readintellectual disabilitymental health

Identifiers

PMID37688365
PMCPMC10946455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.