Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37688303›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2024

Effect of known pathological risk factors on the incidence of metastatic lymph nodes and survival in early-stage vulvar cancer: SEER analysis.

Chen Nahshon, Mario M Leitao, Ofer Lavie, Yakir Segev

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chen NahshonDivision for Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0786-6934
Mario M LeitaoGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ofer LavieDivision for Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Yakir SegevDivision for Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe current study was performed to evaluate the incidence of positive lymph nodes (LNs) in relation to known pathological risk factors, specifically among patients with apparent low-grade, small tumors.

methodsWe used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to retrospectively identify patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) diagnosed between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019, with known tumor size and regional LN examined. A comparison between patients who had positive and negative LNs was conducted to identify risk factors for LN metastases in relation to survival. Subgroup analysis was conducted in patients with diagnosed grade 1 vulvar SCC and tumor size up to 2 cm according to the status of LNs.

resultsMultivariate analysis found that both grade of disease and tumor size were significant factors in predicting LN status. Among patients with low-grade small tumors up to 2 cm, the odds ratio for positive LNs was 2.5 for those with tumor size larger than 1 cm. In a multivariate survival analysis, older age, larger tumor size, and positive LNs were independently associated with decreased survival.

conclusionsThe current study confirms that among small tumors, those larger than 1 cm have a significantly increased risk for positive nodes compared with those smaller than 1 cm, and, among this specific group, patients with positive nodes have decreased survival. Future studies are needed to answer the question of whether, in the era of the sentinel node procedure, it is safe to omit LN evaluation altogether.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellVulvar NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsearly stagelymph nodesmetastasespathological risk factorssurvivalvulvar cancer

Identifiers

PMID37688303
PMCPMC11391884
OpenAlexW4386564747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.