ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Machine-Learning-Based Approach for Railway Track Monitoring Using Acceleration Measured on an In-Service Train.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, a novel railway track monitoring approach is proposed that employs acceleration responses measured on an in-service train to detect the loss of stiffness in the track sub-layers. An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm is developed that works with the energies of the train acceleration responses. A numerical model of a half-car train coupled with a track profile is employed to simulate the train vertical acceleration. The energy of acceleration signals measured from 100 traversing trains is used to train the ANN for healthy track conditions. The energy is calculated every 15 m along the track, each of which is called a slice. In the monitoring phase, the trained ANN is used to predict the energies of a set of train crossings. The predicted energies are compared with the simulated ones and represented as the prediction error. The damage is modeled by reducing the soil stiffness at the sub-ballast layer that represents hanging sleepers. A damage indicator (DI) based on the prediction error is proposed to visualize the differences in the predicted energies for different damage cases. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is performed where the impact of signal noise, slice sizes, and the presence of multiple damaged locations on the performance of the DI is assessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.