ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Experimental Investigation of Acoustic Features to Optimize Intelligibility in Cochlear Implants.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Auditory Performance in Cochlear Implants Using Machine Learning Methods: A Systematic Review.Audiology research · 2025Review
- Impact of Mask Type as Training Target for Speech Intelligibility and Quality in Cochlear-Implant Noise Reduction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Bat2Web: A Framework for Real-Time Classification of Bat Species Echolocation Signals Using Audio Sensor Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although cochlear implants work well for people with hearing impairment in quiet conditions, it is well-known that they are not as effective in noisy environments. Noise reduction algorithms based on machine learning allied with appropriate speech features can be used to address this problem. The purpose of this study is to investigate the importance of acoustic features in such algorithms. Acoustic features are extracted from speech and noise mixtures and used in conjunction with the ideal binary mask to train a deep neural network to estimate masks for speech synthesis to produce enhanced speech. The intelligibility of this speech is objectively measured using metrics such as Short-time Objective Intelligibility (STOI), Hit Rate minus False Alarm Rate (HIT-FA) and Normalized Covariance Measure (NCM) for both simulated normal-hearing and hearing-impaired scenarios. A wide range of existing features is experimentally evaluated, including features that have not been traditionally applied in this application. The results demonstrate that frequency domain features perform best. In particular, Gammatone features performed best for normal hearing over a range of signal-to-noise ratios and noise types (STOI = 0.7826). Mel spectrogram features exhibited the best overall performance for hearing impairment (NCM = 0.7314). There is a stronger correlation between STOI and NCM than HIT-FA and NCM, suggesting that the former is a better predictor of intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners. The results of this study may be useful in the design of adaptive intelligibility enhancement systems for cochlear implants based on both the noise level and the nature of the noise (stationary or non-stationary).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.