ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Digital Forensic Analysis of Vehicular Video Sensors: Dashcams as a Case.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Firearm Thefts from Vehicles in the United States: Results from a National Survey of Firearm Owners.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dashcams are considered video sensors, and the number of dashcams installed in vehicles is increasing. Native dashcam video players can be used to view evidence during investigations, but these players are not accepted in court and cannot be used to extract metadata. Digital forensic tools, such as FTK, Autopsy and Encase, are specifically designed for functions and scripts and do not perform well in extracting metadata. Therefore, this paper proposes a dashcam forensics framework for extracting evidential text including time, date, speed, GPS coordinates and speed units using accurate optical character recognition methods. The framework also transcribes evidential speech related to lane departure and collision warning for enabling automatic analysis. The proposed framework associates the spatial and temporal evidential data with a map, enabling investigators to review the evidence along the vehicle's trip. The framework was evaluated using real-life videos, and different optical character recognition (OCR) methods and speech-to-text conversion methods were tested. This paper identifies that Tesseract is the most accurate OCR method that can be used to extract text from dashcam videos. Also, the Google speech-to-text API is the most accurate, while Mozilla's DeepSpeech is more acceptable because it works offline. The framework was compared with other digital forensic tools, such as Belkasoft, and the framework was found to be more effective as it allows automatic analysis of dashcam evidence and generates digital forensic reports associated with a map displaying the evidence along the trip.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.