ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Second-Order Method for Removing Mixed Noise from Remote Sensing Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combining K-fold cross validation with bayesian hyperparameter optimization for accuracy enhancement of land cover and land use classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Regeneration Filter: Enhancing Mosaic Algorithm for Near Salt & Pepper Noise Reduction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remote sensing image denoising is of great significance for the subsequent use and research of images. Gaussian noise and salt-and-pepper noise are prevalent noises in images. Contemporary denoising algorithms often exhibit limitations when addressing such mixed noise scenarios, manifesting in suboptimal denoising outcomes and the potential blurring of image edges subsequent to the denoising process. To address the above problems, a second-order removal method for mixed noise in remote sensing images was proposed. In the first stage of the method, dilated convolution was introduced into the DnCNN (denoising convolutional neural network) network framework to increase the receptive field of the network, so that more feature information could be extracted from remote sensing images. Meanwhile, a DropoutLayer was introduced after the deep convolution layer to build the noise reduction model to prevent the network from overfitting and to simplify the training difficulty, and then the model was used to perform the preliminary noise reduction on the images. To further improve the image quality of the preliminary denoising results, effectively remove the salt-and-pepper noise in the mixed noise, and preserve more image edge details and texture features, the proposed method employed a second stage on the basis of adaptive median filtering. In this second stage, the median value in the original filter window median was replaced by the nearest neighbor pixel weighted median, so that the preliminary noise reduction result was subjected to secondary processing, and the final denoising result of the mixed noise of the remote sensing image was obtained. In order to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the algorithm, the remote sensing image denoising experiments and denoised image edge detection experiments were carried out in this paper. When the experimental results are analyzed through subjective visual assessment, images denoised using the proposed method exhibit clearer and more natural details, and they effectively retain edge and texture features. In terms of objective evaluation, the performance of different denoising algorithms is compared using metrics such as mean square error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and mean structural similarity index (MSSIM). The experimental outcomes indicate that the proposed method for denoising mixed noise in remote sensing images outperforms traditional denoising techniques, achieving a clearer image restoration effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.