Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37687675›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Application of Machine Learning in Material Synthesis and Property Prediction.

Guannan Huang, Yani Guo, Ye Chen, Zhengwei Nie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Symmetry is the Key to the Design of Reticular Frameworks.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guannan HuangSchool of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China.
Yani GuoSchool of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China.
Ye ChenSchool of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China.
Zhengwei NieSchool of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4374-8620

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52206257Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China BK20200686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Material innovation plays a very important role in technological progress and industrial development. Traditional experimental exploration and numerical simulation often require considerable time and resources. A new approach is urgently needed to accelerate the discovery and exploration of new materials. Machine learning can greatly reduce computational costs, shorten the development cycle, and improve computational accuracy. It has become one of the most promising research approaches in the process of novel material screening and material property prediction. In recent years, machine learning has been widely used in many fields of research, such as superconductivity, thermoelectrics, photovoltaics, catalysis, and high-entropy alloys. In this review, the basic principles of machine learning are briefly outlined. Several commonly used algorithms in machine learning models and their primary applications are then introduced. The research progress of machine learning in predicting material properties and guiding material synthesis is discussed. Finally, a future outlook on machine learning in the materials science field is presented.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningmaterial screeningmaterial synthesisproperty prediction

Identifiers

PMID37687675
PMCPMC10488794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.