ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Computational Complexity and Its Influence on Predictive Capabilities of Machine Learning Models for Concrete Mix Design.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative performance of bagging and boosting ensemble models for predicting lumpy skin disease with multiclass-imbalanced data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Real-time prediction of early concrete compressive strength using AI and hydration monitoring.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Influence of Optimization Algorithms and Computational Complexity on Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction Machine Learning Models for Concrete Mix Design.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Durability Performance for Chloride Ingress Considering Long-Term Aged GGBFS and FA Concrete and Analysis of the Relationship between Concrete Mixture Characteristic and Passed Charge Using Machine Learning Algorithm.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Estimation of concrete materials uniaxial compressive strength using soft computing techniques.Heliyon · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The design of concrete mixtures is crucial in concrete technology, aiming to produce concrete that meets specific quality and performance criteria. Modern standards require not only strength but also eco-friendliness and production efficiency. Based on the Three Equation Method, conventional mix design methods involve analytical and laboratory procedures but are insufficient for contemporary concrete technology, leading to overengineering and difficulty predicting concrete properties. Machine learning-based methods offer a solution, as they have proven effective in predicting concrete compressive strength for concrete mix design. This paper scrutinises the association between the computational complexity of machine learning models and their proficiency in predicting the compressive strength of concrete. This study evaluates five deep neural network models of varying computational complexity in three series. Each model is trained and tested in three series with a vast database of concrete mix recipes and associated destructive tests. The findings suggest a positive correlation between increased computational complexity and the model's predictive ability. This correlation is evidenced by an increment in the coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.