ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Enhancing Starch-Based Packaging Materials: Optimization of Plasticizers and Process Parameters.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of Glycerin Pitch and Its Application as a Plasticizer in Thermoplastic Starch Films.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Mechanical, Thermal, and Morphological Properties of PBAT/PLA Biocomposites Reinforced with Jute and Banana Fibers.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Influence of plasticizer type on the structure and drug release characteristics of LM-pectin hydrogels.Turkish journal of chemistry · 2026Article
- The Effects of the Substrate Length and Cultivation Time on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Mycelium-Based Cushioning Materials fromBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Vegetative and microbial proteins for bioplastics applications - a review in the indian context.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Characterization ofHeliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to actively promote green production and address these concerns, there is an urgent need for new packaging materials to replace traditional plastic products. Starch-based packaging materials, composed of starch, fiber, and plasticizers, offer a degradable and environmentally friendly alternative. However, there are challenges related to the high crystallinity and poor compatibility between thermoplastic starch and fibers, resulting in decreased mechanical properties. To address these challenges, a novel approach combining plasticizer optimization and response surface method (RSM) optimization has been proposed to enhance the mechanical properties of starch-based packaging materials. This method leverages the advantages of composite plasticizers and process parameters. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography results demonstrate that the composite plasticizer effectively disrupts the hydrogen bonding and granule morphology of starch, leading to a significant reduction in crystallinity. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy results show that an addition of glycerol and D-fructose to the starch can form new hydrogen bonds between them, resulting in an enhanced plasticizing effect. The optimal process parameters are determined using the RSM, resulting in a forming temperature of 198 °C, a forming time of 5.4 min, and an AC content of 0.84 g. Compared with the non-optimized values, the tensile strength increases by 12.2% and the rebound rate increases by 8.1%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.