ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Development of a Resilience Parameter for 3D-Printable Shape Memory Polymer Blends.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Entropy-Enthalpy Competition on the Thermochemically Driven Shape Memory Effect in Amorphous Polymer Films.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Effect of Elastomer Content and Annealing on the Physical Properties of Upcycled Polyethylene Terephthalate-Maleated Styrene Ethylene Butylene Styrene Blends for Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this paper was to establish a metric, which we refer to as the resilience parameter, to evaluate the ability of a material to retain tensile strength after damage recovery for shape memory polymer (SMP) systems. In this work, three SMP blends created for the additive manufacturing process of fused filament fabrication (FFF) were characterized. The three polymer systems examined in this study were 50/50 by weight binary blends of the following constituents: (1) polylactic acid (PLA) and maleated styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene (SEBS-g-MA); (2) acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and SEBS-g-MA); and (3) PLA and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). The blends were melt compounded and specimens were fabricated by way of FFF and injection molding (IM). The effect of shape memory recovery from varying amounts of initial tensile deformation on the mechanical properties of each blend, in both additively manufactured and injection molded forms, was characterized in terms of the change in tensile strength vs. the amount of deformation the specimens recovered from. The findings of this research indicated a sensitivity to manufacturing method for the PLA/TPU blend, which showed an increase in strength with increasing deformation recovery for the injection molded samples, which indicates this blend had excellent resilience. The ABS/SEBS blend showed no change in strength with the amount of deformation recovery, indicating that this blend had good resilience. The PLA/SEBS showed a decrease in strength with an increasing amount of initial deformation, indicating that this blend had poor resilience. The premise behind the development of this parameter is to promote and aid the notion that increased use of shape memory and self-healing polymers could be a strategy for mitigating plastic waste in the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.