ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Influence of the In-Fill Pattern of the 3D Printed Building Wall on Its Thermal Insulation.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recycled Components in 3D Concrete Printing Mixes: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Use of Innovative Methods to Produce Highly Insulating Walls Using 3D-Printing Technology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intensive development of 3D Concrete Printing (3DCP) technology causes constantly increased its share in the construction sector. However, in order to produce products with controlled properties, optimization of the technological process is still required. Automation of production based on additive manufacturing methods streamlines the process by comprehensively manufacturing building components that meet, among others, strength, visual, and insulation requirements. Moreover, the possibility of using computer simulations to assess the properties of the designed elements allows for a multitude of analyzed versions of the constructed partitions, which can be verified at the design stage. Thanks to such an opportunity, the process of designing building elements can be significantly improved. The article presents results related to the assessment of the level of thermal insulation of products that can be produced by additive technology, depending on the applied spatial geometry of the vertical partition and the amount and type of materials used. Eight original solutions of in-fill pattern were designed, for which both Finite Element Method (FEM) computer simulations of thermal conductivity and experimental measurements of thermal conductivity of samples were performed. On the basis of the obtained results, both the correctness of the simulation results for the various analyzed materials and their consistency with the practical results were found. Depending on the investigated geometry, for samples of the same dimensions and using the same material, the differences in the U-factor obtained by FEM analysis amounted to 61%. The best solution from the investigated spatial geometries of the vertical partitions has been indicated. The U parameter in the variant with the best thermal insulation was 0.183 W/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.