Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37687216›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Mass Spectrometric Fingerprint Mapping Reveals Species-Specific Differences in Plant Polyphenols and Related Bioactivities.

Suvi Vanhakylä, Juha-Pekka Salminen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Polyphenol Analysis and Antibacterial Potentials of Twig Extracts ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suvi VanhakyläNatural Chemistry Research Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0388-3705
Juha-Pekka SalminenNatural Chemistry Research Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2912-7094

Funding

Academy of Finland 258992Academy of Finland 341836Finnish Cultural Foundation 00181150Finnish Cultural Foundation 00191129Vilho, Yrjö and Kalle Väisälä Foundation S.V.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant species show large variation in the composition and content of their tannins and other polyphenols. These large metabolites are not easy to measure accurately, but they are important factors for species bioactivity and chemotaxonomy. Here, we used an automated group-specific UHPLC-DAD-MS/MS tool to detect and quantify eight most common polyphenol groups in 31 chemically diverse plant species representing many types of growth forms and evolutionary ages. Ten replicate plants were used for each species and two polyphenol-related bioactivities, i.e., protein precipitation capacity and oxidative activity were measured in all samples as well. By the help of a novel 2D fingerprint mapping tool we were able to visualize the qualitative and quantitative differences between the species in hydrolysable tannins (galloyl and hexahydroxydiphenoyl derivatives), proanthocyanidins (procyanidins and prodelphinidins), flavonols (kaempferol, quercetin and myricetin derivatives) and quinic acid derivatives together with the two bioactivities. The highest oxidative activities were found with species containing ellagitannins (e.g.,

Indexed as

OnagraceaeProanthocyanidinsHydrolyzable TanninsPolyphenolsTandem Mass SpectrometryTanninsHydrolyzable TanninsPolyphenolsProanthocyanidinsTanninsbioactivitychemical diversitychemotaxonomyflavonolsoxidative activityphytochemistryprotein precipitationtannins

Identifiers

PMID37687216
PMCPMC10490256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.