ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks for Light Hydrocarbon Separation.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mesoporous Silica-Supported MOF Composites for CONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Polymeric Sorbents as Energy-Efficient Alternative to Cryogenic Distillation for Light Hydrocarbon Purification.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Carboxylate-Ligand-Based Coordination Polymers and Metal Complexes: From Structural Diversity and Supramolecular Descriptors to Function-Oriented Design.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Biomass Waste to Multifunctional Biochar: Tailored Preparation and Emerging Applications in Energy, Environment, and Sensing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- DFT-guided Lennard-Jones parametrization for accurateJournal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Solvent Regulation in Layered Zn-MOFs for CMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Efficient Selective Capture of Carbon Dioxide from Nitrogen and Methane Using a Metal-Organic Framework-Based Nanotrap.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Influence of the Substituent's Size in the Phosphinate Group on the Conformational Possibilities of Ferrocenylbisphosphinic Acids in the Design of Coordination Polymers and Metal-Organic Frameworks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The separation of light hydrocarbon compounds is an important process in the chemical industry. Currently, its separation methods mainly include distillation, membrane separation, and physical adsorption. However, these traditional methods or materials have some drawbacks and disadvantages, such as expensive equipment costs and high energy consumption, poor selectivity, low separation ratios, and separation efficiencies. Therefore, it is important to develop novel separation materials for light hydrocarbon separation. As a new type of organic-inorganic hybrid crystalline material, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are promising materials for light hydrocarbon separation due to their designability of structure and easy modulation of function. This review provides an overview of recent advances in the design, synthesis, and application of MOFs for light hydrocarbon separation in recent years, with a focus on the separation of alkane, alkene, and alkyne. We discuss strategies for improving the adsorption selectivity and capacity of MOFs, including pore size limitation, physical adsorption, and chemisorption. In addition, we discuss the advantages/disadvantages, challenges, and prospects of MOFs in the separation of light hydrocarbon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.