Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686869›Full record

ReviewNutrients2023

Consumer Interaction with Sustainability Labelling on Food Products: A Narrative Literature Review.

Brian Cook, João Costa Leite, Mike Rayner, Sandro Stoffel, Elaine van Rijn, Jan Wollgast

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. One Biology and the Status of Humans.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  10. Consumer Perception of Plant-Based Cheese.Journal of food science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian CookIndependent Researcher, Oxford OX4 3UD, UK.
João Costa LeiteEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Mike RaynerNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0479-6483
Sandro StoffelResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0124-0941
Elaine van RijnEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Jan WollgastEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6077-8653

Funding

European Commission EX2022D594371-101; CT-EX2022D594537-101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainability labelling on food products can help consumers make informed purchasing decisions and support the urgent transition to sustainable food systems. While there is a relatively robust body of evidence on health and nutrition labelling, less is known about the effectiveness of sustainability labelling in facilitating sustainable food choices. This paper investigates the impact of sustainability labelling on consumer understanding, attitudes, and behaviour to support a more nuanced, detailed, and holistic understanding of the evidence. Using a narrative literature review methodology, the paper assesses studies covering environmental, social, and/or animal welfare aspects of sustainability labelling on food products. We found that consumer understanding of sustainability information is often limited, which could hinder behaviour change. While sustainability labelling can influence consumer attitudes and purchasing behaviours, evidence from real consumer settings tends to show small effect sizes. Consumers are generally willing to pay more for sustainability-labelled products, and organic labelling often leads to the highest reported willingness to pay. The review emphasises the importance of trust, suggesting a preference for labelling backed by governments or public authorities. Sustainability labelling that uses intuitively understandable cues has an increased impact, with visual aids such as traffic light colours showing promise. We conclude that further research is needed in real-world settings, using representative populations and exploring the influence of demographic factors, values, and attitudes.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareCuesAnimalsGovernmentGroup ProcessesProduct Labelingconsumer behavioureffectivenessfood labellingreviewsustainability labelling

Identifiers

PMID37686869
PMCPMC10489983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.