Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686848›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Methodological Principles of Nasal Food Challenge.

Edyta Krzych-Fałta, Monika E Czerwińska, Sławomir Białek, Konrad Furmańczyk, Bolesław Samoliński, Błażej Grodner, Adam Sybilski, Grażyna Nowicka, Oksana Wojas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edyta Krzych-FałtaDepartment of Basic Nursing, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Monika E CzerwińskaDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacogenomics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8159-0174
Sławomir BiałekDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacogenomics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0112-6786
Konrad FurmańczykInstitute of Information Technology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Bolesław SamolińskiDepartment of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Błażej GrodnerDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacogenomics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Adam Sybilski2nd Department of Pediatrics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland.
Grażyna NowickaDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacogenomics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9556-6813
Oksana WojasDepartment of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thanks to their valuable assessment possibilities (subjective complaints and changes in nasal patency during the examination), nasal provocation tests may serve as an alternative tool for oral food challenges in the future. However, this test requires successive attempts to regulate its methodology in order to develop a standardized lyophilisate form and determine the threshold dose for a positive result. The study objective was to present the methodological foundation for nasal food allergen provocation tests induced by freeze-dried powdered chicken egg whites. A control group of 25 individuals with no history of allergy to chicken eggs or any other allergy was included in the study. Optical rhinometry and visual analog scales were used to assess the response of nasal mucosa to local allergen challenges. Minor variations in nasal flows, as measured by optical rhinometry, were observed in the provocation tests. The mean optical density measurements (as measured regardless of the allergen dose used) varied from positive to negative values and vice versa, e.g., amounting to 0.018 OD (standard deviation 0.095) at 15 min and -0.011 OD (standard deviation 0.090) at 30 min. No significant differences were observed concerning the perceived nasal discomfort using the visual analog scale. Due to the absence of nasal mucosal reactivity, nasal challenge is an excellent methodological tool for implementing food allergen tests.

Indexed as

HypersensitivityNasal Provocation TestsAllergensFoodHumansNasal MucosaAllergensegg allergynasal food challengeoptical rhinometryVAS scale

Identifiers

PMID37686848
PMCPMC10489609
OpenAlexW4386307507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.