Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686675›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Management of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer-Comparison of Global Guidelines over the Last 5 Years.

Monika Pajewska, Olga Partyka, Aleksandra Czerw, Andrzej Deptała, Elżbieta Cipora, Izabela Gąska, Marek Wojtaszek, Katarzyna Sygit, Marian Sygit, Edyta Krzych-Fałta and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metastatic pancreatic cancer with activatingWorld journal of clinical cases · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Monika PajewskaDepartment of Health Economics and Medical Law, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7735-5219
Olga PartykaDepartment of Health Economics and Medical Law, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra CzerwDepartment of Health Economics and Medical Law, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6189-6678
Andrzej DeptałaDepartment of Oncology Propaedeutics, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-2043
Elżbieta CiporaMedical Institute, Jan Grodek State University in Sanok, 38-500 Sanok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7794-550X
Izabela GąskaMedical Institute, Jan Grodek State University in Sanok, 38-500 Sanok, Poland.
Marek WojtaszekMedical Institute, Jan Grodek State University in Sanok, 38-500 Sanok, Poland.
Katarzyna SygitFaculty of Health Sciences, Calisia University, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7173-2266
Marian SygitFaculty of Health Sciences, Calisia University, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland.
Edyta Krzych-FałtaDepartment of Basic of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.
Daria Schneider-MatykaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.
Anna M CybulskaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-287X
Elżbieta GrochansDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3679-7002
Alicja Asendrych-WoźniakClinical Department of Oncology, The National Institute of Medicine of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka RomanowiczClinical Department of Oncology, The National Institute of Medicine of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Jarosław DrobnikDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-141 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5472-1485
Ewa BandurskaCenter for Competence Development, Integrated Care and e-Health, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-204 Gdansk, Poland.
Weronika CiećkoCenter for Competence Development, Integrated Care and e-Health, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-204 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1496-1924
Barbara Maciuszek-BartkowskaDepartment of Biophysics, Poznan University of Medical Sciencies, 60-780 Poznan, Poland.
Mateusz CuryłoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland.
Kacper WróbelDepartment of Management and Logistics in Healthcare, Medical University of Lodz, 90-131 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4272-5440
Remigiusz KozłowskiCenter for Security Technologies in Logistics, Faculty of Management, University of Lodz, 90-237 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2781-5341
Michał MarczakCollegium of Management, WSB Merito University in Warsaw, 03-204 Warszawa, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLJan Grodek State Vocational Academy in Sanok · PLPomeranian Medical University · PLGdańsk Medical University · PLMedical University of Lodz · PLMinistry of Interior and Administration · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Łódź · PLWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage of its development, which results in lower overall survival (OS). Prognosis is also poor even with curative-intent surgery. Approximately 80% of patients with localized PDAC have micrometastases at the time of diagnosis, which leads to a worse prognosis than in other cancers. The objective of this study is to present the progress in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer based on the recommendations of oncological scientific societies, such as ESMO, NCCN, ASCO, NICE and SEOM, over the last 5 years. Combined FOLFIRINOX therapy is mostly a recommended therapy among patients with good performance statuses, while gemcitabine is recommended for more fragile patients as a first-line treatment. The newest guidelines suggest that molecular profiling of the tumor should be the first step in determining the course of treatment. The use of modern molecular therapies in patients with specific gene mutations should extend the survival of patients with this disease.

Indexed as

guidelinesmetastasespancreatic cancerpancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37686675
PMCPMC10486352
OpenAlexW4386435895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.