Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686619›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening: The Future Is Now.

Michaela Cellina, Laura Maria Cacioppa, Maurizio Cè, Vittoria Chiarpenello, Marco Costa, Zakaria Vincenzo, Daniele Pais, Maria Vittoria Bausano, Nicolò Rossini, Alessandra Bruno and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
31.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michaela CellinaRadiology Department, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20121 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7401-1971
Laura Maria CacioppaDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Maurizio CèPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8906-5665
Vittoria ChiarpenelloPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Marco CostaPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Zakaria VincenzoPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Daniele PaisPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-6485-5632
Maria Vittoria BausanoPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Nicolò RossiniDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Alessandra BrunoDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Chiara FloridiDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
University of Milan · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer has one of the worst morbidity and fatality rates of any malignant tumour. Most lung cancers are discovered in the middle and late stages of the disease, when treatment choices are limited, and patients' survival rate is low. The aim of lung cancer screening is the identification of lung malignancies in the early stage of the disease, when more options for effective treatments are available, to improve the patients' outcomes. The desire to improve the efficacy and efficiency of clinical care continues to drive multiple innovations into practice for better patient management, and in this context, artificial intelligence (AI) plays a key role. AI may have a role in each process of the lung cancer screening workflow. First, in the acquisition of low-dose computed tomography for screening programs, AI-based reconstruction allows a further dose reduction, while still maintaining an optimal image quality. AI can help the personalization of screening programs through risk stratification based on the collection and analysis of a huge amount of imaging and clinical data. A computer-aided detection (CAD) system provides automatic detection of potential lung nodules with high sensitivity, working as a concurrent or second reader and reducing the time needed for image interpretation. Once a nodule has been detected, it should be characterized as benign or malignant. Two AI-based approaches are available to perform this task: the first one is represented by automatic segmentation with a consequent assessment of the lesion size, volume, and densitometric features; the second consists of segmentation first, followed by radiomic features extraction to characterize the whole abnormalities providing the so-called "virtual biopsy". This narrative review aims to provide an overview of all possible AI applications in lung cancer screening.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer-aided detectiondeep learninglung cancerlung cancer screeninglung nodulepersonalized medicinepersonalized screening programsradiomicsegmentationvirtual biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37686619
PMCPMC10486721
OpenAlexW4386304030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.