Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686612›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Appraisal of Systemic Treatment Strategies in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer-A Literature Review.

Danilo Giffoni de Mello Morais Mata, Rania Chehade, Malek B Hannouf, Jacques Raphael, Phillip Blanchette, Abdullah Al-Humiqani, Monali Ray

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danilo Giffoni de Mello Morais MataDivision of Medical Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7375-4346
Rania ChehadeDivision of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Malek B HannoufDepartment of Internal Medicine, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Jacques RaphaelDivision of Medical Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9484-0224
Phillip BlanchetteDivision of Medical Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.
Abdullah Al-HumiqaniDivision of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3701-7530
Monali RayDivision of Medical Oncology, Markham Stouffville Hospital, Markham, ON L3P 7P3, Canada.
Western University · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAMarkham Stouffville Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancer phenotypes. Even after the completion of the standard combination of chemotherapy and trastuzumab, relapse events occur in approximately 15% of cases. The neoadjuvant approach has multiple benefits that include the potential to downgrade staging and convert previously unresectable tumors to operable tumors. In addition, achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) following preoperative systemic treatment is prognostic of enhanced survival outcomes. Thus, optimal evaluation among the suitable strategies is crucial in deciding which patients should be selected for the neoadjuvant approach.

methodsA literature search was conducted in the Embase, Medline, and Cochrane electronic libraries.

conclusionThe evaluation of tumor and LN staging and, hence, stratifying BC recurrence risk are decisive factors in guiding clinicians to optimize treatment decisions between the neoadjuvant versus adjuvant approaches. For each individual case, it is important to consider the most likely postsurgical outcome, since, if the patient does not obtain pCR following neoadjuvant treatment, they are eligible for adjuvant T-DM1 in the case of residual disease. This review of HER2-positive female BC outlines suitable neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic treatment strategies for guiding clinical decision making around the selection of an appropriate therapy.

Indexed as

chemotherapyhuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positiveinvasive breast carcinomamonoclonal antibodyneoadjuvant and adjuvant treatmentpertuzumabtrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID37686612
PMCPMC10486709
OpenAlexW4386283692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.