Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686557›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Where Do We Stand?

Lawek Berzenji, Wen Wen, Stijn Verleden, Erik Claes, Suresh Krishan Yogeswaran, Patrick Lauwers, Paul Van Schil, Jeroen M H Hendriks

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Extended lobectomy-how minimally invasive can we go?Translational lung cancer research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lawek BerzenjiDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Wen WenDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Stijn VerledenDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Erik ClaesAntwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Laboratory of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0008-8739-5725
Suresh Krishan YogeswaranDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Patrick LauwersDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Paul Van SchilDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1962-8821
Jeroen M H HendriksDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9145-3643
University of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last two decades, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has gained popularity as a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) alternative to multi- and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). With this approach, the surgeon obviates the known drawbacks of conventional MIS, such as the reduced in-depth perception, hand-eye coordination, and freedom of motion of the instruments. Previous studies have shown that a robotic approach for operable lung cancer has treatment outcomes comparable to other MIS techniques such as multi-and uniportal VATS, but with less blood loss, a lower conversion rate to open surgery, better lymph node dissection rates, and improved ergonomics for the surgeon. The thoracic surgeon of the future is expected to perform more complex procedures. More patients will enter a multimodal treatment scheme making surgery more difficult due to severe inflammation. Furthermore, due to lung cancer screening programs, the number of patients presenting with operable smaller lung nodules in the periphery of the lung will increase. This, combined with the fact that segmentectomy is becoming an increasingly popular treatment for small peripheral lung lesions, indicates that the future thoracic surgeons need to have profound knowledge of segmental resections. New imaging techniques will help them to locate these lesions and to achieve a complete oncologic resection. Current robotic techniques exist to help the thoracic surgeon overcome these challenges. In this review, an update of the latest MIS approaches and nodule detection techniques will be given.

Indexed as

lobectomyminimally invasive surgerynodule detectionnon-small cell lung cancerrobotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgerysublobar resectionsvideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID37686557
PMCPMC10487098
OpenAlexW4386220294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.