Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686517›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Impact of Age at Diagnosis on Clinicopathological Features, Prognosis, and Management of Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience from Spain.

Cristina Díaz Del Arco, Luis Ortega Medina, Lourdes Estrada Muñoz, Elena Molina Roldán, Soledad García Gómez de Las Heras, María Jesús Fernández Aceñero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina Díaz Del ArcoDepartment of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6100-4967
Luis Ortega MedinaDepartment of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Lourdes Estrada MuñozDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Rey Juan Carlos University, Móstoles, 28933 Madrid, Spain.
Elena Molina RoldánDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8882-8405
Soledad García Gómez de Las HerasDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Rey Juan Carlos University, Móstoles, 28933 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9384-3714
María Jesús Fernández AceñeroDepartment of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2439-3553
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of age on various aspects of gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial. Clarifying this issue can improve our understanding of the disease, refine risk stratification models, and aid in personalized therapeutic approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of age at diagnosis on the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and management of a specific cohort of Spanish patients with resected GC. The study encompassed 315 patients treated at a single tertiary hospital in Spain, divided into two age-based subgroups: ≤65 years and >65 years. The mean and median ages at diagnosis were 72 and 76 years. Most tumors were diagnosed at pT3 stage (49.2%), and 59.6% of patients had lymph node metastases. 21.3% of cases were diagnosed with GC at age ≤ 65 years. Younger patients showed a significantly higher prevalence of flat, diffuse, high-grade tumors, signet-ring cells, perineural infiltration, D2 lymphadenectomies, and adjuvant therapy. They also exhibited a higher rate of recurrences, but had a significantly longer follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated no significant prognostic differences based on age. Finally, age did not independently predict overall survival or disease-free survival. Our results suggest that younger patients may require more aggressive treatment due to adverse clinicopathologic features, but the lack of prognostic differences among age groups in our cohort indicates the need for further investigation into the complex interplay between age, clinicopathologic factors, and long-term outcomes in GC.

Indexed as

ageclinicopathological featuresgastric cancerprognosisyounger

Identifiers

PMID37686517
PMCPMC10486869
OpenAlexW4386141637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.