Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686501›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Deep-Learning-Based Dose Predictor for Glioblastoma-Assessing the Sensitivity and Robustness for Dose Awareness in Contouring.

Robert Poel, Amith J Kamath, Jonas Willmann, Nicolaus Andratschke, Ekin Ermiş, Daniel M Aebersold, Peter Manser, Mauricio Reyes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert PoelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Amith J KamathARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Jonas WillmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Ekin ErmişDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6974-6762
Daniel M AebersoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9493-3834
Peter ManserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Mauricio ReyesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2434-9990
University of Bern · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Innosuisse - Swiss Innovation Agency 31274.1 IP-LS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External beam radiation therapy requires a sophisticated and laborious planning procedure. To improve the efficiency and quality of this procedure, machine-learning models that predict these dose distributions were introduced. The most recent dose prediction models are based on deep-learning architectures called 3D U-Nets that give good approximations of the dose in 3D almost instantly. Our purpose was to train such a 3D dose prediction model for glioblastoma VMAT treatment and test its robustness and sensitivity for the purpose of quality assurance of automatic contouring. From a cohort of 125 glioblastoma (GBM) patients, VMAT plans were created according to a clinical protocol. The initial model was trained on a cascaded 3D U-Net. A total of 60 cases were used for training, 15 for validation and 20 for testing. The prediction model was tested for sensitivity to dose changes when subject to realistic contour variations. Additionally, the model was tested for robustness by exposing it to a worst-case test set containing out-of-distribution cases. The initially trained prediction model had a dose score of 0.94 Gy and a mean DVH (dose volume histograms) score for all structures of 1.95 Gy. In terms of sensitivity, the model was able to predict the dose changes that occurred due to the contour variations with a mean error of 1.38 Gy. We obtained a 3D VMAT dose prediction model for GBM with limited data, providing good sensitivity to realistic contour variations. We tested and improved the model's robustness by targeted updates to the training set, making it a useful technique for introducing dose awareness in the contouring evaluation and quality assurance process.

Indexed as

deep learningdose predictionglioblastomaquality assuranceradiotherapyVMAT

Identifiers

PMID37686501
PMCPMC10486555
OpenAlexW4386141794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.