Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686493›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Locoregional Treatment in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Treatment for Which Patient?

Héloïse Bourien, Chiara Carlotta Pircher, Boris Guiu, Angela Lamarca, Juan W Valle, Monica Niger, Julien Edeline

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Cholangiocarcinoma 2026: status quo, unmet needs and priorities.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Ivosidenib for IDH1-Mutant Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Insights From a Multicenter Real-World Study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Héloïse BourienMedical Oncology Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, 35000 Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8979-3972
Chiara Carlotta PircherMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Boris GuiuInterventional Radiology Department, CHU de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1277-3054
Angela LamarcaOncology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, 28022 Madrid, Spain.
Juan W ValleMedical Oncology Department, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1999-0863
Monica NigerMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Julien EdelineMedical Oncology Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, 35000 Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8289-7741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC), different locoregional treatments (LRT) could be proposed to patients, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or transarterial treatments, depending on patient and tumor characteristics and local expertise. These different techniques of LRT have not been compared in a randomized clinical trial; most of the relevant studies are retrospective and not comparative. The aim of this narrative review is to help clinicians in their everyday practice discuss the pros and cons of each LRT, depending on the individual characteristics of their patients.

Indexed as

cholangiocarcinomalocoregional treatment

Identifiers

PMID37686493
PMCPMC10486617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.