Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686446›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

The Impact of Biomaterial Surface Properties on Engineering Neural Tissue for Spinal Cord Regeneration.

Victor A da Silva, Bianca C Bobotis, Felipe F Correia, Théo H Lima-Vasconcellos, Gabrielly M D Chiarantin, Laura De La Vega, Christiane B Lombello, Stephanie M Willerth, Sônia M Malmonge, Vera Paschon and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Innovative Strategies in 3D Bioprinting for Spinal Cord Injury Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor A da SilvaLaboratório de Neurogenética, Universidade Federal do ABC, Alameda da Universidade s/n, São Bernardo do Campo 09606-070, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7062-7808
Bianca C BobotisLaboratório de Neurogenética, Universidade Federal do ABC, Alameda da Universidade s/n, São Bernardo do Campo 09606-070, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3274-339X
Felipe F CorreiaLaboratório de Neurogenética, Universidade Federal do ABC, Alameda da Universidade s/n, São Bernardo do Campo 09606-070, SP, Brazil.
Théo H Lima-VasconcellosLaboratório de Neurogenética, Universidade Federal do ABC, Alameda da Universidade s/n, São Bernardo do Campo 09606-070, SP, Brazil.
Gabrielly M D ChiarantinLaboratório de Neurogenética, Universidade Federal do ABC, Alameda da Universidade s/n, São Bernardo do Campo 09606-070, SP, Brazil.
Laura De La VegaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Christiane B LombelloCentro de Engenharia, Modelagem e Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal do ABC, São Bernardo do Campo 09606-070, SP, Brazil.
Stephanie M WillerthDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1665-7723
Sônia M MalmongeCentro de Engenharia, Modelagem e Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal do ABC, São Bernardo do Campo 09606-070, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1753-6712
Vera PaschonLaboratório de Neurogenética, Universidade Federal do ABC, Alameda da Universidade s/n, São Bernardo do Campo 09606-070, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre H KiharaLaboratório de Neurogenética, Universidade Federal do ABC, Alameda da Universidade s/n, São Bernardo do Campo 09606-070, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do ABC · BRUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation 2020/11667-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering for spinal cord injury (SCI) remains a complex and challenging task. Biomaterial scaffolds have been suggested as a potential solution for supporting cell survival and differentiation at the injury site. However, different biomaterials display multiple properties that significantly impact neural tissue at a cellular level. Here, we evaluated the behavior of different cell lines seeded on chitosan (CHI), poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL), and poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) scaffolds. We demonstrated that the surface properties of a material play a crucial role in cell morphology and differentiation. While the direct contact of a polymer with the cells did not cause cytotoxicity or inhibit the spread of neural progenitor cells derived from neurospheres (NPCdn), neonatal rat spinal cord cells (SCC) and NPCdn only attached and matured on PCL and PLLA surfaces. Scanning electron microscopy and computational analysis suggested that cells attached to the material's surface emerged into distinct morphological populations. Flow cytometry revealed a higher differentiation of neural progenitor cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC-NPC) into glial cells on all biomaterials. Immunofluorescence assays demonstrated that PCL and PLLA guided neuronal differentiation and network development in SCC. Our data emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate biomaterials for tissue engineering in SCI treatment.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsNerve TissueSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord RegenerationAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsHumansRatsTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialsbiomaterial surfacecell replacementhiPSCshuman induced pluripotent stem cellsspinal cord injurytissue therapy

Identifiers

PMID37686446
PMCPMC10488158
OpenAlexW4386422884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.