Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686169›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Lipoprotein(a): Just an Innocent Bystander in Arterial Hypertension?

Gabriele Brosolo, Andrea Da Porto, Stefano Marcante, Alessandro Picci, Filippo Capilupi, Patrizio Capilupi, Luca Bulfone, Antonio Vacca, Nicole Bertin, Cinzia Vivarelli and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Lipoprotein(a) in Essential Hypertension: Associations with Blood Pressure and Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Lipoprotein(a) and panvascular disease.Lipids in health and disease · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Bibliometric analysis of residual cardiovascular risk: trends and frontiers.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriele BrosoloDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Andrea Da PortoDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9995-0169
Stefano MarcanteDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Alessandro PicciDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Filippo CapilupiDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Patrizio CapilupiDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Luca BulfoneDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1657-4888
Antonio VaccaDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0051-7723
Nicole BertinDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Cinzia VivarelliDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Jacopo ComandDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Cristiana CatenaDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Leonardo A SechiDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6242-0209
University of Udine · IT

Funding

PierSilverio Nassimbeni Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a relatively common and highly heritable trait conferring individuals time-dependent risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Following its first description, Lp(a) triggered enormous scientific interest in the late 1980s, subsequently dampened in the mid-1990s by controversial findings of some prospective studies. It was only in the last decade that a large body of evidence has provided strong arguments for a causal and independent association between elevated Lp(a) levels and CVD, causing renewed interest in this lipoprotein as an emerging risk factor with a likely contribution to cardiovascular residual risk. Accordingly, the 2022 consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society has suggested inclusion of Lp(a) measurement in global risk estimation. The development of highly effective Lp(a)-lowering drugs (e.g., antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering RNA, both blocking LPA gene expression) which are still under assessment in phase 3 trials, will provide a unique opportunity to reduce "residual cardiovascular risk" in high-risk populations, including patients with arterial hypertension. The current evidence in support of a specific role of Lp(a) in hypertension is somehow controversial and this narrative review aims to overview the general mechanisms relating Lp(a) to blood pressure regulation and hypertension-related cardiovascular and renal damage.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisHypertensionLipoprotein(a)Blood PressureHumansKidneyProspective StudiesLipoprotein(a)antisense oligonucleotidesarterial stiffnesscardiovascular diseaseendothelial cellshypertensionhypertensive organ damagelipoprotein(a)renal functionsmall interfering RNAvascular smooth muscle cells

Identifiers

PMID37686169
PMCPMC10487946
OpenAlexW4386246312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.