Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686053›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Increased Cell Proliferation as a Key Event in Chemical Carcinogenesis: Application in an Integrated Approach for the Testing and Assessment of Non-Genotoxic Carcinogenesis.

Christian Strupp, Marco Corvaro, Samuel M Cohen, J Christopher Corton, Kumiko Ogawa, Lysiane Richert, Miriam N Jacobs

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian StruppGowan Crop Protection Ltd., Harpenden AL5 2JQ, UK.
Marco CorvaroCorteva Agriscience, 00100 Rome, Italy.
Samuel M CohenDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology and Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5047-0962
J Christopher CortonCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Kumiko OgawaDivision of Pathology, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki 210-9501, Japan.
Lysiane RichertZylan, 67210 Obernai, France.
Miriam N JacobsUnited Kingdom Health Security Agency (UK HSA), Radiation, Chemicals and Environmental Hazards, Harwell Innovation Campus, Dicot OX11 0RQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4858-0118
Environmental Protection Agency · USNational Institute of Health Sciences · JPUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to genotoxic carcinogens, there are currently no internationally agreed upon regulatory tools for identifying non-genotoxic carcinogens of human relevance. The rodent cancer bioassay is only used in certain regulatory sectors and is criticized for its limited predictive power for human cancer risk. Cancer is due to genetic errors occurring in single cells. The risk of cancer is higher when there is an increase in the number of errors per replication (genotoxic agents) or in the number of replications (cell proliferation-inducing agents). The default regulatory approach for genotoxic agents whereby no threshold is set is reasonably conservative. However, non-genotoxic carcinogens cannot be regulated in the same way since increased cell proliferation has a clear threshold. An integrated approach for the testing and assessment (IATA) of non-genotoxic carcinogens is under development at the OECD, considering learnings from the regulatory assessment of data-rich substances such as agrochemicals. The aim is to achieve an endorsed IATA that predicts human cancer better than the rodent cancer bioassay, using methodologies that equally or better protect human health and are superior from the view of animal welfare/efficiency. This paper describes the technical opportunities available to assess cell proliferation as the central gateway of an IATA for non-genotoxic carcinogenicity.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisCarcinogensAgrochemicalsAnimalsBiological AssayCell ProliferationHumansAgrochemicalsCarcinogenscarcinogenicityhazard assessmentmitogenicitymolecular targetsnew approach methods (NAMs)non-genotoxic carcinogensregenerative proliferation

Identifiers

PMID37686053
PMCPMC10488128
OpenAlexW4386221532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.