Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686035›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

NANOBODY

Sarah Kunz, Manon Durandy, Laetitia Seguin, Chloe C Feral

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advances in Nanobody-Based Platforms for Precision Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Improving the solubility of single domain antibodies using VH-like hallmark residues.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Broad-Spectrum Engineered Multivalent Nanobodies Against SARS-CoV-1/2.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Characterization of plant produced VBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah KunzUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS UMR7284, INSERM U1081, IRCAN, 06107 Nice, France.
Manon DurandyUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS UMR7284, INSERM U1081, IRCAN, 06107 Nice, France.
Laetitia SeguinUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS UMR7284, INSERM U1081, IRCAN, 06107 Nice, France.
Chloe C FeralUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS UMR7284, INSERM U1081, IRCAN, 06107 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9756-2082
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although antibodies remain the most widely used tool for biomedical research, antibody technology is not flawless. Innovative alternatives, such as Nanobody

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBiomedical ResearchExcipientsFluorescent DyesImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsAntibodies, MonoclonalExcipientsFluorescent DyesImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsImmunoglobulin Heavy Chainsdiagnostic and therapeutic strategiessingle variable domainVHHS

Identifiers

PMID37686035
PMCPMC10487883
OpenAlexW4386222120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.