ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Incorporating Monoclonal Antibodies into the First-Line Treatment of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Positron emission tomography-adapted therapy for first-line treatment in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment Outcomes With Novel Targeted and Immunotherapeutic Regimens in CAYA Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Retrospective Study.Cancer innovation · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence advancements in monoclonal antibody development technology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Metabolic Interactions in the Tumor Microenvironment of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Implications for Targeted Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- PD-L1/PD-L2 genetic profile in the molecular cytogenetic classification of classic Hodgkin lymphoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Current Issues and Future Perspectives of Targeted Therapies in Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of Comorbidities on Prognosis and Treatment Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Doxorubicin Exposure and Breast Cancer Risk in Survivors of Adolescent and Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Article
- How I Follow Hodgkin Lymphoma in First Complete (Metabolic) Remission?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Prognostic Impact of Serum βCancers · 2024Article
- Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). A Narrative Review.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The long-term survival of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated according to the current standard of care is excellent. Combined-modality schedules (ABVD plus radiotherapy) in early-stage disease, along with treatment intensity adaptation to early metabolic response assessed by PET/CT in advanced stage HL, have been the cornerstones of risk stratification and treatment decision-making, minimizing treatment-related complications while keeping efficacy. Nevertheless, a non-negligible number of patients are primary refractory or relapse after front-line treatment. Novel immunotherapeutic agents, namely Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), have already shown outstanding efficacy in a relapsed/refractory setting in recent landmark studies. Several phase 2 single-arm studies suggest that the addition of these agents in the frontline setting could further improve long-term disease control permitting one to reduce the exposure to cytotoxic drugs. However, a longer follow-up is needed. At the time of this writing, the only randomized phase 3 trial so far published is the ECHELON-1, which compares 1 to 1 BV-AVD (Bleomycin is replaced by BV) with standard ABVD in untreated advanced-stage III and IV HL. The ECHELON-1 trial has proven that BV-AVD is safe and more effective both in terms of long-term disease control and overall survival. Just recently, the results of the S1826 SWOG trial demonstrated that the combination nivolumab-AVD (N-AVD) is better than BV-AVD, while preliminary results of other randomized ongoing phase 3 trials incorporating anti-PD-1 in this setting will be soon available. The aim of this review is to present the recent data regarding these novel agents in first-line treatment of HL and to highlight current and future trends which will hopefully reshape the overall management of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.