Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685960›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Advances in Preparation and Properties of Regenerated Silk Fibroin.

Linlin Huang, Jifeng Shi, Wei Zhou, Qing Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recent Advances in Silk Fibroin Derived fromJournal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Photobonding of silk fibroin-based hydrogels to rabbit corneas.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linlin HuangCollege of Sericulture, Textile and Biomass Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Jifeng ShiCollege of Sericulture, Textile and Biomass Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Wei ZhouCollege of Sericulture, Textile and Biomass Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Qing ZhangCollege of Sericulture, Textile and Biomass Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the years, silk fibroin (SF) has gained significant attention in various fields, such as biomedicine, tissue engineering, food processing, photochemistry, and biosensing, owing to its remarkable biocompatibility, machinability, and chemical modifiability. The process of obtaining regenerated silk fibroin (RSF) involves degumming, dissolving, dialysis, and centrifugation. RSF can be further fabricated into films, sponges, microspheres, gels, nanofibers, and other forms. It is now understood that the dissolution method selected greatly impacts the molecular weight distribution and structure of RSF, consequently influencing its subsequent processing and application. This study comprehensively explores and summarizes different dissolution methods of SF while examining their effects on the structure and performance of RSF. The findings presented herein aim to provide valuable insights and references for researchers and practitioners interested in utilizing RSF in diverse fields.

Indexed as

FibroinsCentrifugationFood HandlingMicrospheresRenal DialysisFibroinsdissolution methodpropertyregenerated silk fibroinsilk fibroin fiberstructure

Identifiers

PMID37685960
PMCPMC10487664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.