Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685676›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Machine Learning Based Linking of Patient Reported Outcome Measures to WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Activity/Participation Categories.

Richard Habenicht, Elisabeth Fehrmann, Peter Blohm, Gerold Ebenbichler, Linda Fischer-Grote, Josef Kollmitzer, Patrick Mair, Thomas Kienbacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard HabenichtKarl-Landsteiner-Institute of Outpatient Rehabilitation Research, 1230 Vienna, Austria.
Elisabeth FehrmannKarl-Landsteiner-Institute of Outpatient Rehabilitation Research, 1230 Vienna, Austria.
Peter BlohmKarl-Landsteiner-Institute of Outpatient Rehabilitation Research, 1230 Vienna, Austria.
Gerold EbenbichlerKarl-Landsteiner-Institute of Outpatient Rehabilitation Research, 1230 Vienna, Austria.
Linda Fischer-GroteKarl-Landsteiner-Institute of Outpatient Rehabilitation Research, 1230 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2383-1926
Josef KollmitzerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, TGM College for Higher Vocational Education, 1200 Vienna, Austria.
Patrick MairDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Thomas KienbacherKarl-Landsteiner-Institute of Outpatient Rehabilitation Research, 1230 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the primary and secondary medical health sector, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used to assess a patient's disease-related functional health state. However, the World Health Organization (WHO), in its recently adopted resolution on "strengthening rehabilitation in all health systems", encourages that all health sectors, not only the rehabilitation sector, classify a patient's functioning and health state according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

aimThis research sought to optimize machine learning (ML) methods that fully and automatically link information collected from PROMs in persons with unspecific chronic low back pain (cLBP) to limitations in activities and restrictions in participation that are listed in the WHO core set categories for LBP. The study also aimed to identify the minimal set of PROMs necessary for linking without compromising performance.

methodsA total of 806 patients with cLBP completed a comprehensive set of validated PROMs and were interviewed by clinical psychologists who assessed patients' performance in activity limitations and restrictions in participation according to the ICF brief core set for low back pain (LBP). The information collected was then utilized to further develop random forest (RF) methods that classified the presence or absence of a problem within each of the activity participation ICF categories of the ICF core set for LBP. Further analyses identified those PROM items relevant to the linking process and validated the respective linking performance that utilized a minimal subset of items.

resultsCompared to a recently developed ML linking method, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) values for the novel RF methods showed overall improved performance, with AUC values ranging from 0.73 for the ICF category d850 to 0.81 for the ICF category d540. Variable importance measurements revealed that minimal subsets of either 24 or 15 important PROM variables (out of 80 items included in full set of PROMs) would show similar linking performance.

conclusionsFindings suggest that our optimized ML based methods more accurately predict the presence or absence of limitations and restrictions listed in ICF core categories for cLBP. In addition, this accurate performance would not suffer if the list of PROM items was reduced to a minimum of 15 out of 80 items assessed.

Indexed as

international classification of functioninglow back painmachine learningpatient reported outcome measuresrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID37685676
PMCPMC10488436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.