Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685536›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Inter-Rater Reliability of Collateral Status Assessment Based on CT Angiography: A Retrospective Study of Middle Cerebral Artery Ischaemic Stroke.

Daria D Dolotova, Evgenia R Blagosklonova, Rustam Sh Muslimov, Ganipa R Ramazanov, Tatyana A Zagryazkina, Valentin N Stepanov, Andrey V Gavrilov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daria D DolotovaDepartment of Bioinformatics, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Russian Ministry of Health, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Evgenia R BlagosklonovaResearch Department, Gammamed-Soft, Ltd., 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-060X
Rustam Sh MuslimovDepartment of Radiology, Scientific Department of Emergency Neurology and Rehabilitation Treatment, N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow Health Department, 129090 Moscow, Russia.
Ganipa R RamazanovDepartment of Radiology, Scientific Department of Emergency Neurology and Rehabilitation Treatment, N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow Health Department, 129090 Moscow, Russia.
Tatyana A ZagryazkinaResearch Department, Gammamed-Soft, Ltd., 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0003-7620-0535
Valentin N StepanovDepartment of Radiology, Scientific Department of Emergency Neurology and Rehabilitation Treatment, N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow Health Department, 129090 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey V GavrilovResearch Department, Gammamed-Soft, Ltd., 127473 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research 18-29-26007 (mk)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of assessing the collateral status (CS) in patients with ischaemic stroke (IS) has repeatedly been emphasised in clinical guidelines. Various publications offer qualitative or semiquantitative scales with gradations corresponding to the different extents of the collaterals, visualised mostly on the basis of CTA images. However, information on their inter-rater reliability is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the inter-rater reliability of the scales for collateral assessment. CTA images of 158 patients in the acute period of IS were used in the study. The assessment of CS was performed by two experts using three methodologies: the modified Tan scale, the Miteff scale, and the Rosenthal scale. Cohen's kappa, weighted kappa and Krippendorff's alpha were used as reliability measures. For the modified Tan scale and the Miteff and Rosenthal scales, the weighted kappa values were 0.72, 0.49 and 0.59, respectively. Although the best measure of consistency was found for the modified Tan scale, no statistically significant differences were revealed among the scales. The impact of the CS on the degree of neurological deficit at discharge was shown for the modified Tan and Rosenthal scales. In conclusion, the analysis showed a moderate inter-rater reliability of the three scales, but was not able to distinguish the best one among them.

Indexed as

collateral scorecollateral statusCT angiographyinter-rater reliabilityischaemic strokescoring

Identifiers

PMID37685536
PMCPMC10487547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.