Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685440›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Waist-to-Height Ratio: A Sensitive Tool for Assessing the Need for Nutritional Risk Management in Elderly Populations from Brazil.

Vivian C Honorato Dos Santos Carvalho, Leila B Moreira, Vivian C Luft, Sandra C Fuchs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advantages and Limitations of the Body Mass Index (BMI) to Assess Adult Obesity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vivian C Honorato Dos Santos CarvalhoPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2400, 2º Andar, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre 90035-003, RS, Brazil.
Leila B MoreiraPost-Graduate Program in Cardiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2400, 2º Andar, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre 90035-003, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4730-7988
Vivian C LuftPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2400, 2º Andar, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre 90035-003, RS, Brazil.
Sandra C FuchsPost-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2400, 2º Andar, Santa Cecilia, Porto Alegre 90035-003, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6351-9588

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior CAPES), Brazil-Finance Code 001Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre FIPE-GPPG:16-0187National Council for Scientific and Technological Development CNPq: 309023/2015-7National Council for Scientific and Technological Development CNPq: 316802/2021-2National Council for Scientific and Technological Development CNPq; Ref:457469/2013-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNutritional status assessment commonly relies on body mass index (BMI), which overlooks lean mass and adipose tissue distribution. However, waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) provide additional insights into fat accumulation. By combining these indices, it may be possible to identify older adults needing weight management interventions.

objectivesTo assess the WC and WHtR as strategies for identifying individuals requiring weight management.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 509 elderly individuals in Northeast Brazil. Weight, height, hip circumference, and waist circumference were measured, and combined with indices such as BMI WC, WHR, and WHtR to identify those who require weight management. The DeLong test compared areas under the curves using receiver operating characteristic curves and statistical significance. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated to verify usefulness for clinical application. A validation sample of 599 elderly individuals from the country's Southern region was used to confirm the results.

resultsBoth WC and WHtR showed adequate diagnostic accuracy with no statistically significant difference in AUCs. WHtR ≥ 0.50 had 92% sensitivity in identifying men and women requiring nutritional management. WC presented lower sensitivity but 93% specificity, useful for excluding elderly individuals from the nutritional risk category. These results were consistent in the validation sample.

conclusionWHtR is a valuable index for screening nutritional risk management in the elderly population, applicable to men and women. Conversely, WC performs better in excluding individuals who do not need nutritional risk management.

Indexed as

abdominal obesityBMIobesitysensitivity and specificitywaist circumferencewaist-to-height ratio

Identifiers

PMID37685440
PMCPMC10486933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.