ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Challenges in Implementing the Local Node Infrastructure for a National Federated Machine Learning Network in Radiology.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Federated learning frameworks: quality and interoperability for biomedical research.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data-driven machine learning in medical research and diagnostics needs large-scale datasets curated by clinical experts. The generation of large datasets can be challenging in terms of resource consumption and time effort, while generalizability and validation of the developed models significantly benefit from variety in data sources. Training algorithms on smaller decentralized datasets through federated learning can reduce effort, but require the implementation of a specific and ambitious infrastructure to share data, algorithms and computing time. Additionally, it offers the opportunity of maintaining and keeping the data locally. Thus, data safety issues can be avoided because patient data must not be shared. Machine learning models are trained on local data by sharing the model and through an established network. In addition to commercial applications, there are also numerous academic and customized implementations of network infrastructures available. The configuration of these networks primarily differs, yet adheres to a standard framework composed of fundamental components. In this technical note, we propose basic infrastructure requirements for data governance, data science workflows, and local node set-up, and report on the advantages and experienced pitfalls in implementing the local infrastructure with the German Radiological Cooperative Network initiative as the use case example. We show how the infrastructure can be built upon some base components to reflect the needs of a federated learning network and how they can be implemented considering both local and global network requirements. After analyzing the deployment process in different settings and scenarios, we recommend integrating the local node into an existing clinical IT infrastructure. This approach offers benefits in terms of maintenance and deployment effort compared to external integration in a separate environment (e.g., the radiology department). This proposed groundwork can be taken as an exemplary development guideline for future applications of federated learning networks in clinical and scientific environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.