Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685391›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

AI Evaluation of Imaging Factors in the Evolution of Stage-Treated Metastases Using Gamma Knife.

Calin G Buzea, Razvan Buga, Maria-Alexandra Paun, Madalina Albu, Dragos T Iancu, Bogdan Dobrovat, Maricel Agop, Viorel-Puiu Paun, Lucian Eva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Calin G BuzeaClinical Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu", 700309 Iasi, Romania.
Razvan BugaClinical Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu", 700309 Iasi, Romania.
Maria-Alexandra PaunDivision Radio Monitoring and Equipment, Section Market Access and Conformity, Federal Office of Communications OFCOM, Avenue de l'Avenir 44, CH-2501 Biel/Bienne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2088-7457
Madalina AlbuClinical Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu", 700309 Iasi, Romania.
Dragos T IancuClinical Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu", 700309 Iasi, Romania.
Bogdan DobrovatClinical Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu", 700309 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9571-2630
Maricel AgopPhysics Department, Technical University "Gheorghe Asachi" Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania.
Viorel-Puiu PaunPhysics Department, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3761-380X
Lucian EvaClinical Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu", 700309 Iasi, Romania.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROAcademia Oamenilor de Știință din România · ROApollonia University · ROGheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iași · RONational Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study investigated whether three deep-learning models, namely, the CNN_model (trained from scratch), the TL_model (transfer learning), and the FT_model (fine-tuning), could predict the early response of brain metastases (BM) to radiosurgery using a minimal pre-processing of the MRI images. The dataset consisted of 19 BM patients who underwent stereotactic-radiosurgery (SRS) within 3 months. The images used included axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences and high-resolution contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE T1w) sequences from the tumor center. The patients were classified as responders (complete or partial response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease).

methodsA total of 2320 images from the regression class and 874 from the progression class were randomly assigned to training, testing, and validation groups. The DL models were trained using the training-group images and labels, and the validation dataset was used to select the best model for classifying the evaluation images as showing regression or progression.

resultsAmong the 19 patients, 15 were classified as "responders" and 4 as "non-responders". The CNN_model achieved good performance for both classes, showing high precision, recall, and F1-scores. The overall accuracy was 0.98, with an AUC of 0.989. The TL_model performed well in identifying the "progression" class, but could benefit from improved precision, while the "regression" class exhibited high precision, but lower recall. The overall accuracy of the TL_model was 0.92, and the AUC was 0.936. The FT_model showed high recall for "progression", but low precision, and for the "regression" class, it exhibited a high precision, but lower recall. The overall accuracy for the FT_model was 0.83, with an AUC of 0.885.

conclusionsAmong the three models analyzed, the CNN_model, trained from scratch, provided the most accurate predictions of SRS responses for unlearned BM images. This suggests that CNN models could potentially predict SRS prognoses from small datasets. However, further analysis is needed, especially in cases where class imbalances exist.

Indexed as

brain metastasismachine learningradiomicsstereotactic radiosurgerytreatment response

Identifiers

PMID37685391
PMCPMC10486549
OpenAlexW4386420384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.