ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Brain-Computer Interface: The HOL-SSA Decomposition and Two-Phase Classification on the HGD EEG Data.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Signal Stacking to Dynamic Coupling: A Critical Review of Wearable EEG-EMG Fusion Brain-Computer Interfaces for Stroke Rehabilitation.Micromachines · 2026Review
- An interpretable deep concatenated architecture for osteoporosis detection using enhanced knee radiographs.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An efficient processing approach is essential for increasing identification accuracy since the electroencephalogram (EEG) signals produced by the Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) apparatus are nonlinear, nonstationary, and time-varying. The interpretation of scalp EEG recordings can be hampered by nonbrain contributions to electroencephalographic (EEG) signals, referred to as artifacts. Common disturbances in the capture of EEG signals include electrooculogram (EOG), electrocardiogram (ECG), electromyogram (EMG) and other artifacts, which have a significant impact on the extraction of meaningful information. This study suggests integrating the Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA) methods to preprocess the EEG data. The key objective of our research was to employ Higher-Order Linear-Moment-based SSA (HOL-SSA) to decompose EEG signals into multivariate components, followed by extracting source signals using Online Recursive ICA (ORICA). This approach effectively improves artifact rejection. Experimental results using the motor imagery High-Gamma Dataset validate our method's ability to identify and remove artifacts such as EOG, ECG, and EMG from EEG data, while preserving essential brain activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.