Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685389›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Preoperative Assessment of Perianal Fistulas with Combined Magnetic Resonance and Tridimensional Endoanal Ultrasound: A Prospective Study.

Nikolaos Varsamis, Christoforos Kosmidis, Grigorios Chatzimavroudis, Fani Apostolidou Kiouti, Christoforos Efthymiadis, Vasilis Lalas, Chrysi Maria Mystakidou, Christina Sevva, Konstantinos Papadopoulos, George Anthimidis and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Endoanal Ultrasound in Perianal Crohn's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nikolaos VarsamisThird Surgical Department, "AHEPA" University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1 Kiriakidi Street, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5849-5515
Christoforos KosmidisThird Surgical Department, "AHEPA" University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1 Kiriakidi Street, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Grigorios ChatzimavroudisSecond Surgical Department, "G. Gennimatas" University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 41 Eth. Aminis Steet, 54635 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Fani Apostolidou KioutiBiostatistics Unit, Medical Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Christoforos EfthymiadisSurgical Department, 'St Luke's' Hospital, 55236 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vasilis LalasRadiology Department, "Euromedica" Diagnostic Center, 35 Gr. Lampraki & Ag. Dimitriou Street, 54638 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Chrysi Maria MystakidouMedical Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6674-7500
Christina SevvaThird Surgical Department, "AHEPA" University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1 Kiriakidi Street, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9869-7835
Konstantinos PapadopoulosThird Surgical Department, "AHEPA" University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1 Kiriakidi Street, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
George AnthimidisSurgical Department, European Interbalkan Medical Center, 10 Asklipiou Street, 55535 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Charilaos KoulourisThird Surgical Department, "AHEPA" University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1 Kiriakidi Street, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Alexandros Vasileios KarakousisThird Surgical Department, "AHEPA" University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1 Kiriakidi Street, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Konstantinos SapalidisThird Surgical Department, "AHEPA" University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1 Kiriakidi Street, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2050-8392
Isaak KesisoglouThird Surgical Department, "AHEPA" University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1 Kiriakidi Street, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GREuromedica · GRInterbalkan Medical Center · GRSt. Luke's Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundwe designed a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy that compared pelvic MRI and 3D-EAUS with pelvic MRI alone in the preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcomes of patients with perianal fistulas.

methodsthe sample size was 72 patients and this was divided into two imaging groups. MRI alone was performed on the first group. Both MRI and 3D-EAUS were performed in parallel on the second group. Surgical exploration took place after two weeks and was the standard reference. Park's classification, the presence of a concomitant abscess or a secondary tract, and the location of the internal opening were recorded. All patients were re-evaluated for complete fistula healing and fecal incontinence six months postoperatively. All of the collected data were subjected to statistical analysis.

resultsthe MRI group included 36 patients with 42 fistulas. The MRI + 3D-EAUS group included 36 patients with 46 fistulas. The adjusted sensitivity and negative predictive value were 1.00 for most fistula types in the group that underwent combined imaging. The adjusted specificity improved for intersphincteric fistulas in the same group. The adjusted balanced accuracy improved for all fistula types except rectovaginal. The combination of imaging methods showed improved diagnostic accuracy only in the detection of a secondary tract. The healing rate at six months was 100%. Fecal incontinence at six months did not present a statistically significant difference between the two groups (Fisher's exact test

conclusionsthe combination of pelvic MRI and 3D-EAUS showed improved metrics of diagnostic accuracy and should be used in the preoperative evaluation of all patients with perianal fistulas, especially those with complex types.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingperianal fistulatridimensional endoanal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37685389
PMCPMC10486944
OpenAlexW4386418165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.