Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685387›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Predicting Future Incidences of Cardiac Arrhythmias Using Discrete Heartbeats from Normal Sinus Rhythm ECG Signals via Deep Learning Methods.

Yehyun Kim, Myeonggyu Lee, Jaeung Yoon, Yeji Kim, Hyunseok Min, Hyungjoo Cho, Junbeom Park, Taeyoung Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yehyun KimSynergy A.I. Co., Ltd., Seoul 07573, Republic of Korea.
Myeonggyu LeeSynergy A.I. Co., Ltd., Seoul 07573, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0000-8860-3276
Jaeung YoonSynergy A.I. Co., Ltd., Seoul 07573, Republic of Korea.
Yeji KimDepartment of Cardiology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul 07985, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0005-4185-9342
Hyunseok MinTomocube Inc., Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7435-7884
Hyungjoo ChoTomocube Inc., Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Junbeom ParkSynergy A.I. Co., Ltd., Seoul 07573, Republic of Korea.
Taeyoung ShinSynergy A.I. Co., Ltd., Seoul 07573, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT - Republic of Korea RS-2022-00155966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of using discrete heartbeats versus an entire 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) as the input for predicting future occurrences of arrhythmia and atrial fibrillation using deep learning models. Experiments were conducted using two types of inputs: a combination of discrete heartbeats extracted from 12-lead ECG and an entire 12-lead ECG signal of 10 s. This study utilized 326,904 ECG signals from 134,447 patients and categorized them into three groups: true-normal sinus rhythm (T-NSR), atrial fibrillation-normal sinus rhythm (AF-NSR), and clinically important arrhythmia-normal sinus rhythm (CIA-NSR). The T-NSR group comprised patients with at least three normal rhythms in a year and no atrial fibrillation or arrhythmias history. Clinically important arrhythmia included atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial premature contraction, atrial tachycardia, ventricular premature contraction, ventricular tachycardia, right and left bundle branch block, and atrioventricular block over the second degree. The AF-NSR group included normal sinus rhythm paired with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter within 14 days, and the CIA-NSR group comprised normal sinus rhythm paired with CIA occurring within 14 days. Three deep learning models, ResNet-18, LSTM, and Transformer-based models, were utilized to distinguish T-NSR from AF-NSR and T-NSR from CIA-NSR. The experiments demonstrated the potential of using discrete heartbeats in predicting future arrhythmia and atrial fibrillation incidences extracted from 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) signals alone, without any additional patient information. The analysis reveals that these discrete heartbeats contain subtle patterns that deep learning models can identify. Focusing on discrete heartbeats may lead to more timely and accurate diagnoses of these conditions, improving patient outcomes and enabling automated diagnosis using ECG signals as a biomarker.

Indexed as

arrhythmia risk predictionartificial intelligenceatrial fibrillation risk prediction

Identifiers

PMID37685387
PMCPMC10487044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.