Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685343›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Non-Invasive and Minimally Invasive Biomarkers for the Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis beyond Peak Eosinophil Counts: Filling the Gap in Clinical Practice.

Pierfrancesco Visaggi, Irene Solinas, Federica Baiano Svizzero, Andrea Bottari, Brigida Barberio, Greta Lorenzon, Matteo Ghisa, Daria Maniero, Elisa Marabotto, Massimo Bellini and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Emerging Tissue and Blood Biomarkers for Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The Dynamic Evolution of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pierfrancesco VisaggiGastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56125 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6985-5301
Irene SolinasGastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56125 Pisa, Italy.
Federica Baiano SvizzeroGastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56125 Pisa, Italy.
Andrea BottariGastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56125 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5343-7271
Brigida BarberioDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Greta LorenzonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9378-2117
Matteo GhisaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6026-5639
Daria ManieroDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2468-7292
Elisa MarabottoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4507-8605
Massimo BelliniGastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56125 Pisa, Italy.
Nicola de BortoliGastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56125 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-1060
Edoardo V SavarinoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic esophageal disease that needs lifelong management and follow-up. The diagnosis requires an upper endoscopy with at least one esophageal biopsy demonstrating >15 eosinophils/high-power field, and often occurs with a diagnostic delay of up to ten years, partly due to the absence of valid non-invasive screening tools. In addition, serial upper endoscopies with esophageal biopsies are mandatory to assess the efficacy of any ongoing treatment in patients with EoE. These procedures are invasive, costly, and, when performed without sedation, are often poorly tolerated by patients. Therefore, there is the clinical need to identify reliable non-invasive or minimally invasive biomarkers that could be used to assess disease activity in clinical practice as a surrogate of peak eosinophil counts on esophageal biopsies. This review summarizes evidence on investigational non-invasive or minimally invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis and follow-up of EoE to report on the state of the art in the field and support future research. We discussed eosinophil-derived mediators including eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN, also known as eosinophil protein X), eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), and major basic protein (MBP) as well as other promising non-eosinophil-derived biomarkers. Although several studies have shown the utility of most biomarkers collected from the serum, esophageal luminal secretions, and feces of EoE patients, numerous limitations currently hamper the integration of such biomarkers in clinical practice. Future studies should aim at validating the utility of non-invasive and minimally invasive biomarkers using rigorous protocols and updated consensus criteria for EoE.

Indexed as

biomarkersECPEDNeosinophilic esophagitisEPOMBP

Identifiers

PMID37685343
PMCPMC10486562
OpenAlexW4386284820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.