Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685314›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Inequities in Screening and HPV Vaccination Programs and Their Impact on Cervical Cancer Statistics in Romania.

Laurentiu Simion, Vlad Rotaru, Ciprian Cirimbei, Laurentia Gales, Daniela-Cristina Stefan, Sinziana-Octavia Ionescu, Dan Luca, Horia Doran, Elena Chitoran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurentiu Simion"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Vlad Rotaru"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Ciprian Cirimbei"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Laurentia Gales"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0414-1607
Daniela-Cristina Stefan"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Sinziana-Octavia Ionescu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Dan Luca"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Horia Doran"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Elena Chitoran"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9225-8030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Introduction: A Romanian woman is diagnosed with cervical cancer every two hours; the country ranks second in Europe in terms of the mortality and incidence rate of this disease. This paper aims to identify the main reasons that have led to this situation, focusing on the measures taken by the Romanian Ministry of Health for the prevention of this type of cancer-national programs for cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination. (2) Materials and methods: We performed a study based on the available secondary data from the National Statistics Institute, World Health Organization and Bucharest Institute of Oncology in order to assess the burden associated with cervical cancer and place it in the context of known global and European incidence and mortality rates, thus evaluating the importance of this health issue in Romania. The second component of our study was a cross-sectional study. Here, we used a 14-question questionnaire applied to the women participating in the National Screening Program for Cervical Cancer and aimed to evaluate the women's level of knowledge about screening and HPV vaccination and their access cervical-cancer-specific healthcare services. (3) Results: The results of this research show that a high percentage of women postpone routine checks due to a lack of time and financial resources and indicate that a low level of knowledge about the disease and the specific preventive methods determines the low participation in screening and HPV vaccination programs implemented in Romania, contributing to the country's cervical cancer situation. (4) Conclusions: The national programs have complicated procedures, are underfunded and do not motivate healthcare workers enough. This, combined with the lack of information for the eligible population, adds up to an extremely low number of women screened and vaccinated. Our conclusion is that the Romanian Ministry of Health must take immediate action by conducting major awareness campaigns, implementing measures to make the programs functional and ensuring coherent funding.

Indexed as

acceptance of vaccines/screeningaccess to health programsbelievescervical cancer screening programHPV vaccination programsincidence and mortality rates for cervical cancerknowledgeparticipation in screening programspelvectomiessocial and global inequities

Identifiers

PMID37685314
PMCPMC10486539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.