Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685276›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Severe

Yiting Liu, Tao Qiu, Haochong Hu, Chenyang Kong, Yalong Zhang, Tianyu Wang, Jiangqiao Zhou, Jilin Zou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yiting LiuDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9368-3290
Tao QiuDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1410-7795
Haochong HuDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Chenyang KongDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Yalong ZhangDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Tianyu WangDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Jiangqiao ZhouDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Jilin ZouDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Wuhan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81400753National Natural Science Foundation of China 81870067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to formulate and validate a prognostic model for postoperative severe

methodsClinical manifestations and laboratory test results upon admission were gathered as variables for 88 patients who experienced PCP following kidney transplantation. The most discriminative variables were identified, and subsequently, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) models were constructed. Finally, the models' predictive capabilities were assessed through ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1-scores. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) algorithm was employed to elucidate the contributions of the most effective model's variables.

resultsThrough lasso regression, five features-hemoglobin (Hb), Procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), progressive dyspnea, and Albumin (ALB)-were identified, and six machine learning models were developed using these variables after evaluating their correlation and multicollinearity. In the validation cohort, the RF model demonstrated the highest AUC (0.920 (0.810-1.000), F1-Score (0.8), accuracy (0.885), sensitivity (0.818), PPV (0.667), and NPV (0.913) among the six models, while the XGB and KNN models exhibited the highest specificity (0.909) among the six models. Notably, CRP exerted a significant influence on the models, as revealed by SHAP and feature importance rankings.

conclusionsMachine learning algorithms offer a viable approach for constructing prognostic models to predict the development of severe disease following PCP in kidney transplant recipients, with potential practical applications.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learning modelsPneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP)predict

Identifiers

PMID37685276
PMCPMC10486565
OpenAlexW4386099415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.