Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685165›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Understanding Protein Functionality and Its Impact on Quality of Plant-Based Meat Analogues.

Jenna Flory, Ruoshi Xiao, Yonghui Li, Hulya Dogan, Martin J Talavera, Sajid Alavi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Engineering Processes for Plant-Based Meat Analogs: Current Status and Future Outlook.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Plant-Based Alternatives to Meat Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Exploring Sustainable Future Protein Sources.Food science of animal resources · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jenna FloryDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Ruoshi XiaoDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Yonghui LiDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4320-0806
Hulya DoganDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7788-732X
Martin J TalaveraSensory and Consumer Research Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Sajid AlaviDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5102-0277
Kansas State University · US

Funding

Kansas Soybean Commission N/AKansas State University Global Food Systems Seed Grant Program N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A greater understanding of protein functionality and its impact on processing and end-product quality is critical for the success of the fast-growing market for plant-based meat products. In this research, simple criteria were developed for categorizing plant proteins derived from soy, yellow pea, and wheat as cold swelling (CS) or heat swelling (HS) through various raw-material tests, including the water absorption index (WAI), least gelation concentration (LGC), rapid visco analysis (RVA), and % protein solubility. These proteins were blended together in different cold-swelling: heat-swelling ratios (0:100 to 90:10 or 0-90% CS) and extruded to obtain texturized vegetable proteins (TVPs). In general, the WAI (2.51-5.61 g/g) and protein solubility (20-46%) showed an increasing trend, while the LGC decreased from 17-18% to 14-15% with an increase in the % CS in raw protein blends. Blends with high CS (60-90%) showed a clear RVA cold viscosity peak, while low-CS (0-40%) blends exhibited minimal swelling. The extrusion-specific mechanical energy for low-CS blends (average 930 kJ/kg) and high-CS blends (average 949 kJ/kg) was similar, even though both were processed with similar in-barrel moisture, but the former had substantially lower protein content (69.7 versus 76.6%). Extrusion led to the aggregation of proteins in all treatments, as seen from the SDS-PAGE and SEC-HPLC analyses, but the protein solubility decreased the most for the high-CS (60-90%) blends as compared to the low-CS (0-40%) blends. This indicated a higher degree of crosslinking due to extrusion for high CS, which, in turn, resulted in a lower extruded TVP bulk density and higher water-holding capacity (average 187 g/L and 4.2 g/g, respectively) as compared to the low-CS treatments (average 226 g/L and 2.9 g/g, respectively). These trends matched with the densely layered microstructure of TVP with low CS and an increase in pores and a spongier structure for high CS, as observed using optical microscopy. The microstructure, bulk density, and WHC observations corresponded well with texture-profile-analysis (TPA) hardness of TVP patties, which decreased from 6949 to 3649 g with an increase in CS from 0 to 90%. The consumer test overall-liking scores (9-point hedonic scale) for TVP patties were significantly lower (3.8-5.1) as compared to beef hamburgers (7.6) (

Indexed as

animal protein alternativesphysicochemical propertiesplant proteinsstructure–function relationships

Identifiers

PMID37685165
PMCPMC10486508
OpenAlexW4386223250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.