Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685078›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Evaluating Factors Explaining U.S. Consumers' Behavioral Intentions toward Irradiated Ground Beef.

Jean A Parrella, Holli R Leggette, Peng Lu, Gary Wingenbach, Matt Baker, Elsa Murano

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jean A ParrellaDepartment of Agricultural, Leadership, and Community Education, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.
Holli R LeggetteDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communications, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Peng LuDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Gary WingenbachDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communications, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1675-8903
Matt BakerDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communications, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Elsa MuranoDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

Funding

Texas A&M Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although food irradiation is deemed safe and endorsed by health-related organizations worldwide, consumers are reluctant to accept the technology. Yet, consumer acceptance is critical as food irradiation has significant potential for increasing the safety and availability of food globally. To communicate about food irradiation, science communicators should understand the psychology behind consumers' decision making related to irradiated foods. Using empirical research, we developed a theoretical model and used structural equation modeling to determine how nine variables affect consumers' behavioral intentions toward irradiated ground beef. We purchased a national quota sample from Qualtrics and surveyed

Indexed as

attitudescommunicationconsumer acceptancefood irradiationfood safetyfood technology neophobiapurchase intentionrisk perceptionsocial normsstructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID37685078
PMCPMC10486656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.