Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37684654›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Health literacy education at the time of COVID-19: development and piloting of an educational programme for university health professional students in 4 European countries.

Roberta Papa, Jane Sixsmith, Cinzia Giammarchi, Sonia Lippke, Verna McKenna, Lucia Di Furia, Maria Gabriella Ceravolo, Andrea De Winter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roberta Papa *Regional Health Agency Marche Region, Palazzo Rossini - via Gentile da Fabriano n.3, Ancona, 60125, Italy. roberta.papa@regione.marche.it.
Jane Sixsmith *Health Promotion Research Centre, Discipline of Health Promotion, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Cinzia GiammarchiIRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Sonia LippkeConstructor University, Bremen, Germany.
Verna McKennaHealth Promotion Research Centre, Discipline of Health Promotion, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Lucia Di FuriaRegional Health Agency Marche Region, Palazzo Rossini - via Gentile da Fabriano n.3, Ancona, 60125, Italy.
Maria Gabriella CeravoloDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Andrea De WinterDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Erasmus+ 2017-1-NL01-KA203-035290German Bundestag 2519FSB519H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network 956501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy has a strong influence on individual health outcomes and the sustainability of healthcare systems. Healthcare professionals often overestimate patients' health literacy levels and lack adequate competencies to address limited health literacy effectively. Therefore, promoting understanding through effective health communication between professionals and citizens is becoming increasingly important. Although health literacy has recently gained more attention, health literacy educational programmes targeting future healthcare professionals are still scarce, especially in Europe. This study describes the piloting process of a pan-European health literacy educational programme and shows how the educational material is being used during time of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThe educational programme was developed through the definition of an educational philosophy and iterative co-creation processes consisting of stakeholders' consultations, material development and pilots with students. The evaluation was carried out in Italy through four pilot tests involving 107 students of health-related degrees. An evaluation questionnaire and a pre-post test were developed and used to collect students' and educators' feedback (quantitative and qualitative) and assess changes in health literacy awareness, respectively. Three additional pilots were organized in Italy and Germany mostly during the COVID-19 pandemic to evaluate the feasibility of the educational programme through online and hybrid learning, respectively.

resultsThe pilots received positive feedback from both students and educators. Students were highly satisfied with the courses, reported their relevance for their future profession and appreciated the interactive teaching methods. The pre-post test showed a significant improvement in health literacy awareness after the training. Educators reported the adequacy and flexibility of the training material, the ease of transferability of the content of the lessons into practice, and the validity of the tested options to integrate the educational programme into the curricula.

conclusionsOur comprehensive, evidence-based educational programme contributes to addressing the existing challenges in Europe, and its flexibility allows for easy integration in the curricula, through different options, hence supporting a widespread uptake in the European Union and maybe beyond. Health literacy education is a useful tool to improve citizens' access to healthcare information and services, achieve better health outcomes and support healthcare systems' sustainability.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health LiteracyEuropeHumansPandemicsStudentsUniversitiesCOVID-19CurriculumHealthcare professionalsHealth literacyHigher educationOnline trainingPatient centred-care

Identifiers

PMID37684654
PMCPMC10492329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.