Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37684516›Full record

ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024

Early Fetal Growth Restriction with or Without Hypertensive Disorders: a Clinical Overview.

Federico Mecacci, Eleonora Romani, Sara Clemenza, Sara Zullino, Laura Avagliano, Felice Petraglia

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Angiogenic factors and fetal Doppler for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome in early-onset small fetuses with and without pre-eclampsia.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Federico MecacciDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Eleonora RomaniDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Sara ClemenzaIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. sara.clemenza@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1216-4275
Sara ZullinoDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0289-5659
Laura AvaglianoUniversity of Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7808-7578
Felice PetragliaDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8851-625X
University of Florence · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) is one of the main adverse pregnancy conditions, often associated with poor neonatal outcomes. Frequently, early onset FGR is associated with early onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), and in particular preeclampsia (PE). However, to date, it is still an open question whether pregnancies complicated by early FGR plus HDP (FGR-HDP) and those complicated by early onset FGR without HDP (normotensive-FGR (n-FGR)) show different prenatal and postnatal outcomes and, consequently, should benefit from different management and long-term follow-up. Recent data support the hypothesis that the presence of PE may have an additional impact on maternal hemodynamic impairment and placental lesions, increasing the risk of poor neonatal outcomes in pregnancy affected by early onset FGR-HDP compared to pregnancy affected by early onset n-FGR. This review aims to elucidate this poor studied topic, comparing the clinical characteristics, perinatal outcomes, and potential long-term sequelae of early onset FGR-HDP and early onset n-FGR.

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPre-EclampsiaPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansInfant, NewbornPlacentaPregnancyEarly onset fetal growth restrictionHypertensive disorders of pregnancyPlacental insufficiencyPreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID37684516
OpenAlexW4386533537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.